Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castlestone Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Castlestone Management

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written, now, as an advert, and so tagged since August 2017, the references in this article are totally lacking in depth or breadth, with PR pieces taking pride of place. The only thing it appears to be notable for is a raid by the regulator. Seems not to be trading in at least that form. Fails WP:CORP. Ironic that I was the AFC reviewer who accepted it in 2014, but that revision survived immediate deletion. Fiddle Faddle 12:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 12:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 12:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable, PR, with a history of SPA’s —Devokewater @ 02:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Article reads more like a puff piece than anything else.TH1980 (talk) 02:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Reads like a PR article Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.