User talk:4TheWynne

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|4TheWynne}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Chris Hemsworth's Filmography

I added Thor: Love and Thunder to his filmography table and this change was reverted. Tessa Thompson has Thor 4 on her filmography, as does Taika Waititi. Therefore, I don't see how it is logical not to include it on Hemsworth's at this point, especially seeing as he is the lead and the film is in pre-production. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrumaLord (talk • contribs) 01:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BrumaLord, as I said, read the note at the top of the filmography section: "Do not add films that have not begun filming yet per WP:CRYSTAL". It doesn't matter how big or how small the role; until the film has begun filming, nothing is absolutely set in stone yet, hence why we have this rule (this is also the reason why film articles aren't created until the film has started filming, as is the case with Thor: Love and Thunder). I have removed the film from Thompson and Waititi's filmography sections for the same reasons. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive?

What was? 2607:FEA8:F420:3DD1:F46F:A010:49B3:D109 (talk) 00:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You made unnecessary additions to the band members section of Machine Head (band) which went against the usual formatting, an edit which was disruptive. Additionally, please don't add a new talk page section to the top of the page – use the "New section" tab at the top of the page, which will create a new section at the bottom of the page (editors are notified when they receive new messages on their talk pages). 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Load

...and here I thought they were reverting vandalism. Thanks for fixing. Rob van vee 11:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robvanvee, all good – I can definitely see how it would have looked a little suspicious, so I can understand the confusion. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 12:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

think its the same

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Afllivestream2020

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nrllivestream

sigh,JarrahTree 14:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica

Why unneccesary?

DallasFletcher (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DallasFletcher, there are already enough images in the article, and your image's placement wasn't very well thought out (placing it directly beneath another image doesn't look neat). Additionally, please don't add a new talk page section to the top of the page – use the "New section" tab at the top of the page, which will create a new section at the bottom of the page (editors are notified when they receive new messages on their talk pages). 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 10:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4TheWynne Sure, but there are already lots of images in the article. Why is a new one "unnecessary"? Also my image's placement is very clearly thought out, off to the side under another picture from the same time period where it belongs. DallasFletcher (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Bettany

It will be a ‘sensible middle ground’ when he’s reverted from ‘English’ back to ‘British-American’ by someone else, which will inevitably happen at some point, so I’m changing him back as he has dual citizenship. By the way, I’m English, so there’s certainly no ‘English bias’ Scf1985 (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFLW minor prems

Your revert:

I'm not even sure if they're not regarded as official minor premierships. It's not like the league will ever clear this up, and its not as if the minor premiers from 2017-18 are any more "official" than 2019-20 just because conferences have been used since 2019. Why not include them in the minor premiership table and include a note saying conferences were used that season. It doesn't seem like wasteful content. For as long the league has conferences, there will always be a team that was technically no. 1 in the home and away season. Seems useful to include them, but hey not a hill im gonna die on if you feel strongly about it. Global-Cityzen (talk) 12:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Global-Cityzen, I can understand the thought process that there could always technically be a no. 1 team while the conference system is in place, but just consider the fact that the conferences aren't totally even and the team that has the best record/percentage might have had an easier run than the team which might have had one less win or been just below them on percentage (in short, there are a few problems that have arisen from having the conferences, as I'm sure you know). The 2017 and 2018 minor premiers are official (just as much as they are in the AFL), as there's a single ladder with one team on top, so I don't understand your argument there – as there are currently two ladders and, hence, two ladder-leaders, it's just not going to be looked upon in the same way. I just think it's a bit far-fetched and content for the sake of content, unfortunately. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 13:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Petty edits

Why are you so petty on my DragonForce edits? Literally every edit I make on page we both have interests in you feel the need to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObviouslyKieran (talk • contribs) 23:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ObviouslyKieran, I'm sorry, what? You've only made edits to the DragonForce article on four occasions in the last couple of years – the first time I reverted you because Killer Elite didn't need to be in the section header, and the last time I fixed your edits because you included original research and didn't fill out the reference properly; you were reverted by other editors on the other two occasions. What exactly am I doing wrong here? Whereabouts in this source does it say that the band is going to livestream some of the recording of this new album on Twitch just like with Extreme Power Metal? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hugh jackman

Since it appears you copied the same response from everyone else. My contribution on jackman's page was constructive, though constructive does not matter at all. It is based on clear and concise information with valid references. I believe the contribution was when he punched dolph ziggler and fractured his face on an episode of WWF Raw that jackman was hosting. If not, something else. Several articles posted online about it. Yet, later information stated it was a work (not real. (pretended)) 90% people do not follow policies on this website anyway and remove contributions that have valid references. Their deleting other people's stuff. Not contributing whatsoever. Many jerks (Not directed at you personally). Whether it was real or not, it should still be posted. I don't wish to have a response.

Majinsnake (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Majinsnake, we discussed this issue over four years ago (see here) – why are you messaging me about it again? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:34, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra Beatdown

I changed the name of a song, as it was incorrect, and my edit got removed MasonDF (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MasonDF, your change wasn't sourced (and what was with the extra text?). 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 07:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your music

I saw on your Wikipedia that u are a musician , I would love to hear some of your work Mafufu (talk) 11:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WARCRAFT Cast

Hi Joshua, My name is Dean Redman, I am actor who was cast and directed by Duncan Jones and played two characters in the movie Warcraft. VARIS and CAGED FROSTWOLF. I am credited on many websites as such IMDB being the most prominent. A Wikipedia page had also been made about me years ago which lists WARCRAFT as one of my film credits. I have been in over 75 movies and shows as well as voiced many characters in animated series. I was flown to los Angeles with my manager and attended the Red Carpet World Premiere of WARCRAFT at the Chinese Theatre and then after party.

All of this information is true. I am a little new to website additions so please forgive me if an error was made however it was non intentional. All I am wanting is for my Warcraft lead cast credits to be honoured on this website like it is on so many other websites around the world. Acting is a very competitive field and a movie like WARCRAFT is a huge achievement.

Hope to have this cleared up, and would like to hear from you. have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.113.173 (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only actors listed on the film's billing block are listed in the article's infobox, and additions anywhere else in the article need to be reliably sourced. If you really are Dean Redman, please also see WP:CONFLICT and WP:PROMOTION – what you're saying just isn't how Wikipedia works. Hope you understand. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Anger

How was the Metallica edit disruptive? 2607:FEA8:F400:314:7843:87B8:9BBC:DAFB (talk) 04:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need to link instruments per WP:OVERLINK, and Hammett and Hetfield both simply played guitar, as opposed to lead and rhythm. Have you even listened to the album? It's pretty well-known for having no solos and very minimal lead playing of any kind. Also, again (I'm pretty certain I've spoken to you before), use the "New section" tab at the top of the page if you want to message me, as that will create a new section at the bottom of the page. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 05:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is my edit of Revenge of the Sith "disruptive editing"?

This review on Rotten Tomatoes called the film "emotionally powerful" on many occasions. https://www.cinencuentro.com/2017/11/12/star-wars-episodio-3-la-venganza-de-los-sith/

The critics' consensus called the film "poignant". https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_iii_revenge_of_the_sith

Tomatometer-approved critic "Chris Stuckmann" said there is a compelling story in the film during his review. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHvoWFUCbio

I don't see anything wrong with pointing out the critics' praise of the "story" and "emotional weight". It is not my opinion. It is the critics' opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seleswarapu3 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seleswarapu3, if you're going to present sources like these, you would actually put them in the article, not just say "critics said __________" in an edit summary. You are only providing one example of each of the things that you are trying to add to the article and making it sound like several critics praised each of those elements, so to say that critics praised the story and "emotional weight" would be synthesis, which is combining material from multiple sources (which you weren't even adding to the article, hence why your edits were considered original research) to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. "It is the critics' opinion"; no, it isn't – one critic said this, one critic said that. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 17:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How did the author of the page come up with terms like "action sequences", "musical score" etc. when describing which elements the critics praised? Why are those terms valid but not terms like "story" and "emotional weight"? Why can't I just add the terms "story" and "emotional weight" and include the sources of the critics' reviews that explicitly mention story and emotional weight? It is not synthesis, since the sources explicitly praise the 'story' and 'emotional weight'.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Seleswarapu3 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics note on reduced game time for 2020 AFL players

Hey mate, just wanted to explain the note on Statistics I added to Dusty's page. It's absolutely necessary to leave in and to add to all players in the league, as the comparability of years is completely ruined given the temporary changes to game time this season. When seasons are presented in a single table, they are assumed to be comparable, but clearly the game time in this season is not. In future years, unfamiliar readers will assume every player got drastically worse this year when this is clearly not true. I've already begun applying it to all Richmond players in my normal maintenance of those 30-odd pages. And for what it's worth, I took the format from the notes applied to banned Essendon players from 2015.--DustyNail (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DustyNail, that's all fair enough, I just wanted to make sure the note about shortened quarters was being applied to all current players and not just some (as a lot of editors seem to do with different formatting edits, etc.). I don't see anybody objecting to us doing this if we were to try and create a discussion out of it, so I'll just add this to my to-do list. While I don't think that the 1994 comparison that I mentioned is completely irrelevant (it was literally shortening quarters from 25 minutes and time on to 20 minutes and time on), there were more instances of umpires blowing time off when the quarters were shortened (e.g. ball-ups, throw-ins) to the point where there wasn't a huge difference in the overall length of quarters, so I guess you could argue either way – I'm not as strong on that as my point about applying the note to all current players, though. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 12:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DustyNail, further, I think that the note should be copyedited/reworded slightly per this edit before implementing everywhere; I know it makes the note a little wordier, but I think it's a bit more succinct, plus it actually explains why the changes were in place for this season – any problems with this wording? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 13:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I like the copy edits. I'll go about implementing it on Richmond players as a priority over the next few days. I'm not one for engaging too deeply on the project talk page but if a discussion does come up there about it, feel free to ping me and I'll contribute a defense. Cheers --DustyNail (talk) 07:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DustyNail, take note of the changes here as well, as you can achieve the same thing with less characters (I know there's probably a 99.9% chance Martin's article is on your watchlist and you'd see it regardless, but just thought I'd bring it to your attention anyway given this is where we're discussing the note). 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 04:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Jobe Watson page

Hello. Not sure why you thought the edit's to Jobe's page "did not appear constructive"? It was literally linking to the website of the coffee shop Hole in the Wall where he worked while in NYC, which is also where he met his wife, and now has business interests in. This is pretty interesting to most people who know he worked a coffee shop in NY particularly to anyone visiting NY who may want to visit. Am I missing something?