Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeryGoodBoy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DeltaQuad (talk | contribs) at 07:25, 8 August 2020 (Marking case as closed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

VeryGoodBoy

VeryGoodBoy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


29 July 2020

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

New user created specifically to edit the page Hanbok.

Some time earlier, User:VeryGoodBoy used a IP address to reinsert content deleted in a previous discussion back to the article Hanbok [1]. The IP can be confidently linked to this case via this message. The person behind Rpdfpd was pushing the same fringe theory of Korean-nomadic connection as VeryGoodBoy/Koraskadi did a number of times before; they also have to be constantly watching the article Hanbok, so presumably they are from the same user. Esiymbro (talk) 07:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Check declined by a checkuser - The previous accounts of this sockmaster are  Stale, and the privacy policy prevents checkusers from publicly connecting accounts to their IP addresses. Mz7 (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Esiymbro: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.
Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]