Talk:Shampoo (film)
Film: American Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
beaten by Rocky Horror?
the statement about the films success seems pretty weird. Rocky Horror Picture Show found success only after years of midnight showings, and "Shampoo" must have done better in original, general release. RHPS didn't turn a real profit for a few years, whereas "Shampoo" was rather successful in general release --judexdot1-- 75.72.234.176 14:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
This is true. 'RHPS' was a non-entity of a film until many years after its release--which I am surprised to discover was this early.
Fair use rationale for Image:Shampoo movie poster.jpeg
Image:Shampoo movie poster.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Remake
-- In 11 July 2009 20th Century Fox, Universal Pictures, Studio Canal and Working Title Films announced that the movie will be the remake of the 1975 classic. --
The above sentence is unintelligible and unsourced. I have moved if from the article to here until someone translates it from gibberish to English and sources it. -- Davidkevin (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)