Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waqar Zaka (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests&type=revision&diff=974338287&oldid=974240310&diffmode=source, "All the information posted about waqar zaka is either wrong or fake details". So we're finding ourselves in the situation is that the subject claims that all the cited sources are wrong, but the subject himself is not a reliable source. After reviewing the sources, I am convinced that they are all celebrity gossip, and using them is a violation of WP:BLP. We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. It is not up to Zaka to prove that they are wrong, it is up to us to prove that they are right. Vexations (talk) 13:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Seriously? You trusted the claims of newbie Shaheryar Shabbir and decided to nominate this BLP for deletion thinking this BLP is WP:JUNK? Subject is notable enough to warrant his own WP biography, whereas WP:DYNAMITE does not apply either because each passage and every single line is properly cited via high-quality RS. Still, if something is misleading, it can be fixed instead of deleting the page outright. Remember, Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing and Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. --Saqib (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to send his official documents I can, I'm not a kid with 0 info you can confirm my identity directly by Mr Waqar Zaka