Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hacker Purity Test (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Hacker Purity Test

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail. Tagged as unsourced since 2010. The test is definitely a "thing" if you poke around on various old servers (example, example) but it does not seem to have attracted any reliable sources in the 31 years since its inception. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to either Hacker culture or Purity test: Barely found anything about the term. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 13:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect doesn't work as long as the topic isn't mentioned in the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's a clear lack of independent sources and I don't think the topic deserves a section in either of the articles mentioned by Superastig. 13:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.