User talk:Starwars1955

I have the right to edit, Mr Darcy, I didn't break the 3RR and I didn't disrupt anything, everyone else updates, you better remove this block immediatly or I'm going to report this, you blocked me cause you can, but with no reasoning, all my info and stats are correct, you are blocking me cause you don't like me, but that's not my problem, now unblock me until I've doe something in which I've deserved it or I'm reporting this abuse, I've done nothing to get blobked and I didn't personally attack you, I did on December 30 and severed that suspention, but I haven't since, now unblock me or I'll file a report. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)

I blocked you again because you removed sources and sourced material from Brett Favre, and that is vandalism. Ordinarily, I'd give a user a few warnings before blocking for vandalism, but you have been warned and blocked multiple times. In addition, during your block, you made a personal attack against me on this page [1], and you repeatedly posted a bogus allegation against another user [2], even restoring it when I investigated and found the claim to be baseless. I'm putting your unblock request below, but I will not rescind my block unless you agree to stop vandalizing Brett Favre. | Mr. Darcy talk 21:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have my word MrDarcy that I won't revert to older versions if that's what your calling vandalism, but I will just update the records and milestones of the current version or yours and provide my citation, that I can do, but I don't deserve this block because I edited to the last version were the stats remained, I didn't even get a warning to just edit the current version and I only reverted the one time, but I won't to that again, I'll just edit the current page and provide citation, but I derserved to be unblocked, starwars1955— Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)

If you're going to remove properly cited material, then I'm not going to unblock you, period. You took out a substantial amount of sourced material and deleted several sources as well. That is the #1 reason why I blocked you so quickly. Removal of properly cited material is vandalism. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Starwars1955 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't made personal attacks or so called bogus allegations against anyone since my block expired and you had no right to block me MrDarcy and the edits I made to Brett Favre were not vandalism, they were all factual edits and the stats were all correct, I was just adding to the records and milestones and I also added a citation, you had no right to block me and you did it because you don't like me and I'm sorry for that, but I've made no personall attacks or I haven't broken the 3RR since my block expired and I also added reasoning and citations to my edits to Brett Favre and you have no right to block me again and I want this block lifted, you can make unlimited edits and long as it's no more than the reverts in 24 hours, but edits are unlimited as long and you explain your edit and possibly provide citations and I did that today and it wasn't vandalism, please remove this block immediatly wikipedia,starwars1955

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I haven't made personal attacks or so called bogus allegations against anyone since my block expired and you had no right to block me MrDarcy and the edits I made to Brett Favre were not vandalism, they were all factual edits and the stats were all correct, I was just adding to the records and milestones and I also added a citation, you had no right to block me and you did it because you don't like me and I'm sorry for that, but I've made no personall attacks or I haven't broken the 3RR since my block expired and I also added reasoning and citations to my edits to Brett Favre and you have no right to block me again and I want this block lifted, you can make unlimited edits and long as it's no more than the reverts in 24 hours, but edits are unlimited as long and you explain your edit and possibly provide citations and I did that today and it wasn't vandalism, please remove this block immediatly wikipedia,starwars1955 |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I haven't made personal attacks or so called bogus allegations against anyone since my block expired and you had no right to block me MrDarcy and the edits I made to Brett Favre were not vandalism, they were all factual edits and the stats were all correct, I was just adding to the records and milestones and I also added a citation, you had no right to block me and you did it because you don't like me and I'm sorry for that, but I've made no personall attacks or I haven't broken the 3RR since my block expired and I also added reasoning and citations to my edits to Brett Favre and you have no right to block me again and I want this block lifted, you can make unlimited edits and long as it's no more than the reverts in 24 hours, but edits are unlimited as long and you explain your edit and possibly provide citations and I did that today and it wasn't vandalism, please remove this block immediatly wikipedia,starwars1955 |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I haven't made personal attacks or so called bogus allegations against anyone since my block expired and you had no right to block me MrDarcy and the edits I made to Brett Favre were not vandalism, they were all factual edits and the stats were all correct, I was just adding to the records and milestones and I also added a citation, you had no right to block me and you did it because you don't like me and I'm sorry for that, but I've made no personall attacks or I haven't broken the 3RR since my block expired and I also added reasoning and citations to my edits to Brett Favre and you have no right to block me again and I want this block lifted, you can make unlimited edits and long as it's no more than the reverts in 24 hours, but edits are unlimited as long and you explain your edit and possibly provide citations and I did that today and it wasn't vandalism, please remove this block immediatly wikipedia,starwars1955 |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Why did you make this revert in the first place? It subtracted a lot of editing and removed many sources.++aviper2k7++ 21:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanted to add to the revert you could have, it was factual info with a citation, you know the peyton manning page has 5 citations on it and this one has 66, this page is getting cluttered with multiple citations that aren't needed, but I added another one anyway to Fox Sports for Brett's Playoff stats.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)

I did edit a recent version, and updated the records and milestones, you guys deleted all my correct stats that I have citations for now in the records and now I have to type all that again, it should have never been deleted in the first place, that's the vandalism, it should have remained until we found citations or agreed it's correct, which it is, so I updated to a the last version where it was all there and if that's the problem, fine, I'll type it all again from scratch, but I don't deserve to be blocked, I didn't vandalise anything, I'm trying to add these stats that are correct that everyone deleted, I know you didn't aviper2k7, but others did.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)

Please read WP:V and WP:CITE. Cluttered citations is not a reason to delete them. And I don't think you did edit a current version because you removed a lot of valid info with sources with the edit summary "(Records and milestones updated)". Take a look at all the information you took out.++aviper2k7++ 22:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People do update the page when you're not here. Just because you didn't do it, doesn't mean it has to be redone.++aviper2k7++ 22:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually tried to verify some of the information Starwars1955 keeps adding, and was generally unable to do so. It doesn't appear, for example, that anyone keeps track of career QB wins, especially not regular-season-plus-playoffs. Profootball-reference, which is one of the more reliable sites for historical NFL stats, doesn't seem to have it as a category, for example. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can everyone except me and MrDarcy quit editing and vandalising my talk page, MrDarcy and I are tyrying to get somewhere here.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)

No, obviousy you can't King Bee, starwars1955