Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger By the Tail

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - as mentioned already, I agree that if fails WP:NBOOK. Additionally, the article is unsourced and the article is lacking in information Eyebeller (talk) 00:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to James Hadley Chase. I couldn't find any reviews for this or anything. It's possible that there are some out there "offline" though due to when the book was originally printed. Given that, I think it's at least a redirect to the authors article if nothing else. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I reworked the article a bit, adding the information about The Man in the Raincoat (1957) film based on this book as well as references to some linguistic studies where this book is mentioned.--Bbarmadillo (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Undoubtedly a low-quality article. But that should be addressed through editing, not deletion. "Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. For instance, one person may start an article with an overview of a subject or a few random facts." - WP:IMPERFECT. "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." - WP:ATD. Regarding notability, please see: 1 2 3 4 — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 12:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]