Talk:MutualArt.com

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bodokh (talk | contribs) at 12:16, 16 December 2020 (→‎Is MutualArt.com reputable?: The idea that Mutualart is a scam is ridiculous. It is a serious company with broad human support and are recognized by the art community and many big players in the industry use our services.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because its a page about a arts directory that is still in progress 38.100.172.130 (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is a large online information website with a worldwide base of members, which deals with a huge amount of information in the artworldRosec92 (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosec92: Please provide independent reliable sources indicating that this website is notable per notability guidelines. There are many large websites with many members; that is not enough for a Wikipedia page. 331dot (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MutualArt and the Artist Pension Trust

The APT was established in 2004 and is ultimately owned by MutualArt https://www.theguardian.com/money/2009/sep/19/artists-pensions By 2018, things were not looking so rosy https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/mar/17/art-pension-trust-investment-legal-action-artists Note that, like my earlier reported experience, the Guardian has found MutualArt suspiciously opaque. I find it impossible to believe that this is anything other than a scam StephenJPC (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]