Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Yang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Amber Yang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Amber Yang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable. Placement of one of the multiple Forbes 30 under 30 lists is not a reliable indicator of anything, , nor is a second-place finish in a high school science fair DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete As an original nominator for redirect and after some discussion this page may be best to delete based on little sourcing available. General lack of scientific accomplishment could also be stated. Dr.Callahan (talk) 08:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete these "30 under 30" lists have become excessive and in no way show notability. We have clear notability criteria for academics and Yang fails those.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but right now does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.