Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Rajasthan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Rajasthan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of non-notable buildings that is sourced entirely to the previously deleted Wikipedia page List of tallest buildings in Jodhpur. This fails WP:LISTN because there are no reliable sources covering these buildings as a group. The list makes little sense as none of the buildings are skyscrapers or notable in any other way. This list has no navigational purpose nor does it meet any other purpose listed at WP:LISTPURP.

Consensus at well over 20 recent AfDs that these types of lists should be deleted if the above criteria are failed. Spiderone 14:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, there is nothing there that can assist in navigation. // Timothy :: talk 22:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no listed names are notable. Dhawangupta (talk) 16:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and as failing my standards. Bearian (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Delete per nom. Riddhidev BISWAS (talk) 08:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]