Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Non-autoconfirmed posts: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:


[[User talk:216.169.108.204]] Hope the person is ok! Should i call the police? [[Special:Contributions/199.58.164.136|199.58.164.136]] ([[User talk:199.58.164.136|talk]]) 02:55, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
[[User talk:216.169.108.204]] Hope the person is ok! Should i call the police? [[Special:Contributions/199.58.164.136|199.58.164.136]] ([[User talk:199.58.164.136|talk]]) 02:55, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

== EMERGENCY USER SAYING THEY ARE GOING TO KILL HIM/HER SELF ==

right here [[User talk:178.162.134.29]] - [[Special:Contributions/27.50.93.126|27.50.93.126]] ([[User talk:27.50.93.126|talk]]) 07:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:44, 5 August 2011


If you are blocked If you cannot post to a noticeboard because you are a new editor, post to this page
  • If you are blocked, please place {{unblock| your reason for unblock}} on your talk page.
  • Start a new thread under a heading using double equals-signs: ==Informative title==.
  • When you start a discussion about an editor, you must notify them on their user talk page.
  • Sign your posts using "~~~~" (four tildes), which is translated into your signature automatically.

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351
352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361
Incidents (archives, search)
1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145
1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472
473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321
322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331
Other links


Hi there, I took note of these rules but let me say something.On wikipedia except classical composers who really are sacred monsters of incontestable value(J.S.Bach,Mozart,Beethoven,Mussorgsky,Tchaikovsky,Vivaldi,Rossini,Chopin,R.Strauss)to name just a very few of them and which the world has forgotten them totally and also except american jazz musicians who really are vallue,the rest,most of them who appear on Wikipedia are just normal and bellow the value level.They can prove with tons of papers and cd´s,concerts,mtv´s videos without any value,that they have references,and that can earn millions dollars.One thing can´t they prove:THE REAL VALUE and TALENT that is NONEXISTENT.I know many such persons.All they´ve put on wikipedia is just lies.Except the papers, these people can´t never,ever prove theirs TALENT or if they are suitable for this profession called MUSICIAN,profession that today is rolling in the mud by anyone. I am from a family of musicians(the real ones),I studied classicaly violin,music theory,harmony and composition(on real),can always prove it,I played all my life only in professional context(studio recording,live concerts,only with best musicians,as jazz instrumentist and many times as classicaly violinist in symphony orchestras).I am also high class arranger - pop,classicaly,jazz).But in Wikipedia´s opinion such musicians do not deserve to be on files. I don´t mind att all,but I wanted to get aware my opinion about all this shit and don´t forget:I will remain the same professional musician who love and respect my job and who never failed to prostitute for money´s sake. Thank you for you took your time to read my lines. M.Ilie --Prodipe (talk) 15:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adnetik approval

Someone may need to take a look at this suicide threats!

User talk:216.169.108.204 Hope the person is ok! Should i call the police? 199.58.164.136 (talk) 02:55, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EMERGENCY USER SAYING THEY ARE GOING TO KILL HIM/HER SELF

right here User talk:178.162.134.29 - 27.50.93.126 (talk) 07:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]