User talk:Arthur Rubin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Arthur Rubin/Archive 2016) (bot
Line 74: Line 74:
</div> [[User:The Interior|The Interior]] via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
</div> [[User:The Interior|The Interior]] via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:The Interior@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=715239328 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:The Interior@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=715239328 -->

== Can anything be done about HughD's tantrum like behavior? ==

I'm trying to avoid the bait that HughD is leaving out but it really seems to me that he is going too far. After the recent ANI you would think a smart editor would avoid old disputes. HughD instead has driven right back into the Chrysler article and the MJ related content, totally ignoring previous discussions and setting up RfC's without allowing others a chance to interject. Do you have any suggestions? [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 20:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:49, 18 April 2016

Write a new message. I will reply on this page, under your post.
This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any sections older than 28 days are automatically archived to User talk:Arthur Rubin/Archive 2024 . Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Status

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia because of hostile editing environment.

TUSC token 6e69fadcf6cc3d11b5bd5144165f2991

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Wikiproject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary

As a current or past contributor to a USCG article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

COASTIE I am (talk) 01:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Wik-Ed Women Session #5

Wik-Ed Women Session #5

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

I would like to personally invite you to the March edition of the Wik-Ed Women meetup, which will take place on March 15, from 6-10 in the evening. It will occur at Los Angeles Contemporary Archive, 2245 E Washington Blvd, Los Angeles, California 90021 (downtown LA -- map). The building has a pink top with old signage for American Accessories, Inc. dba Princess Accessories (Photos [PDF]). There is on-site parking in the back, which also has an entrance. If you cannot attend in person, you are more than willing to work remotely, as we appreciate all help that you can provide. Finally, here is a link to the Facebook event, in case you want to invite friends, as we are always looking for new editors to help expand coverage of women on Wikipedia!

I hope to see you there! Cosmicphantom (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Pushing limits

Is this[1] what you were referring to here[2]? I think one has to assume that if an editor adds Koch related material to the article[3] they would assume the article to be Koch related. I certainly noticed but honestly I would just be happy if HughD would gracefully bow out of the auto topics and we could both agree to leave each other alone (including not revisiting previous points of contention). Springee (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 16

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
  • Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
  • A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
  • Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can anything be done about HughD's tantrum like behavior?

I'm trying to avoid the bait that HughD is leaving out but it really seems to me that he is going too far. After the recent ANI you would think a smart editor would avoid old disputes. HughD instead has driven right back into the Chrysler article and the MJ related content, totally ignoring previous discussions and setting up RfC's without allowing others a chance to interject. Do you have any suggestions? Springee (talk) 20:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]