Doe et al. v. Trump Corp. et al.: Difference between revisions
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Bareurls}} |
plz just put this at the top of the article instead of making me hunt for it every time |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|US District Court case}} |
{{short description|US District Court case}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Infobox court case |
{{Infobox court case |
||
|name = Doe et al v Trump Corp et al |
|name = Doe et al v Trump Corp et al |
||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
===2020=== |
===2020=== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
On 8 April 2020, a New York Southern District court refused the Trumps' motion to halt the lawsuit and compel arbitration of the claims.<ref name="cpradr-2020-04">{{Cite web|url=https://blog.cpradr.org/2020/04/23/seeking-to-arbitrate-a-case-in-litigation-ny-federal-judge-declines-trumps-motion-to-compel/|title=NY Federal Judge Rejects Trumps’ Motion to Compel Arbitration|first=C. P. R.|last=Staff|date=April 23, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-marketing-lawsuit-idUSKCN21R2OH|title=Trump family loses bid to move marketing scam lawsuit to arbitration|first=Jonathan|last=Stempel|date=April 9, 2020|via=www.reuters.com}}</ref> |
On 8 April 2020, a New York Southern District court refused the Trumps' motion to halt the lawsuit and compel arbitration of the claims.<ref name="cpradr-2020-04">{{Cite web|url=https://blog.cpradr.org/2020/04/23/seeking-to-arbitrate-a-case-in-litigation-ny-federal-judge-declines-trumps-motion-to-compel/|title=NY Federal Judge Rejects Trumps’ Motion to Compel Arbitration|first=C. P. R.|last=Staff|date=April 23, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-marketing-lawsuit-idUSKCN21R2OH|title=Trump family loses bid to move marketing scam lawsuit to arbitration|first=Jonathan|last=Stempel|date=April 9, 2020|via=www.reuters.com}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 16:24, 11 December 2020
 |
| Doe et al v Trump Corp et al | |
|---|---|
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 18-09936[1] |
| Doe et al v Trump Corp et al | |
|---|---|
| Court | 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Nos. 20-1228, 20-1278[2] |
Doe et al. v. Trump Corp. et al. is a case put before the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, in October 2018, in which multiple plaintiffs alleged that Donald Trump and his adult children had made large amounts of money by encouraging unsophisticated investors to join fraudulent schemes.[3][1][4][5][6]
Timeline
2018
In October 2018, the lawsuit was filed in a New York federal court.[7]
In December 2018, a New York federal court upheld the plaintiffs' right to anonymity.[8]
2019
On 14 January 2019, the Trumps sought to have charges under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act dropped from the lawsuit.[9]
On 21 February 2019, by which time the plaintiffs had amended their claim, the Trumps sought to have the remaining claims thrown out.[10]
On 19 July 2019, The Trumps notified the court that they intended to compel arbitration.[11]
On 24 July 2019, a New York federal court rejected the plaintiffs' RICO claims, but kept alive many or all of the remaining claims in the lawsuit.[12][13]
2020
On 8 April 2020, a New York Southern District court refused the Trumps' motion to halt the lawsuit and compel arbitration of the claims.[11][14]
On 9 April 2020, unaired footage from The Celebrity Apprentice was ruled admissable as evidence.[15]
On 21 April 2020, the plaintiffs accused the Trumps of attempting to stall the lawsuit.[16]
In May 2020, the Trumps requested a pause in proceedings, to allow them to appeal the decision made in April not to allow them to compel arbitration. On 18 May 2020, a New York federal judge denied this request.
In December 2020, the Trumps again attempted, this time in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, to halt the lawsuit and compel arbitration.[17][18][19]
See also
References
- ^ a b Stempel, Jonathan (February 21, 2019). "Trump, adult children urge dismissal of marketing scam lawsuit". Reuters. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
- ^ "Trumps Want Court to Approve Arbitration for Marketing Fraud Lawsuit". Insurance Journal. December 2, 2020.
- ^ Orden, Erica (October 19, 2018). "New lawsuit claims Trump, children made millions off investment scams". CNN. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie; Weiser, Benjamin (October 29, 2018). "Trump Persuaded Struggling People to Invest in Scams, Lawsuit Says". The New York Times. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
- ^ Larson, Erik; Nasiripour, Shahien (October 29, 2018). "Trump and His Children Accused of Investment Scams in Lawsuit". Bloomberg News. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
- ^ Larson, Erik (December 3, 2018). "Trump Twitter Tirades Prompt Litigants to Seek Anonymity in Suit". Bloomberg News. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
- ^ "Trump Accused Of Conning Thousands Into Bogus Deals - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ "Trump Fraud Accusers Can Stay Anonymous, Judge Says - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ "Trump Looks To Kill Racketeering Fraud Suit Against Kids, Co. - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ "Trump, Kids Say Changes To Racketeering Suit Don't Fix It - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ a b Staff, C. P. R. (April 23, 2020). "NY Federal Judge Rejects Trumps' Motion to Compel Arbitration".
- ^ "Trump, Kids Must Face Fraud Suit Trimmed Of RICO Claims - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ Stempel, Jonathan (July 25, 2019). "Trump must face marketing scam lawsuit, escapes racketeering claims: NY judge" – via www.reuters.com.
- ^ Stempel, Jonathan (April 9, 2020). "Trump family loses bid to move marketing scam lawsuit to arbitration" – via www.reuters.com.
- ^ "'Apprentice' Outtakes Relevant In Fraud Suit Against Trump - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ "Trumps' Latest 'Stall Tactic' Should Be Rejected, Investors Say - Law360". www.law360.com.
- ^ Stempel, Jonathan (December 2, 2020). "Trump family urges U.S. appeals court to move marketing scam lawsuit to arbitration" – via www.reuters.com.
- ^ "Trump Lawyers Accused of Legal 'Gamesmanship' in Attempts to Keep Alleged Pyramid Scheme from Public Trial". www.msn.com.
- ^ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-lawyer-asks-federal-appeals-court-to-send-lawsuit-over-alleged-pyramid-scheme-to-arbitration/ar-BB1bxzux