Talk:Fire protection: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:41, 9 May 2006

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Regarding deletion proposal

I created this article as a stub with the intention of expanding it later. The following is said about stubs on Wikipedia (refer to Wikipedia:stubs): "A stub is an article that's obviously too short, but not so short as to be considered useless. In general, it must be long enough to at least define the article's title, which generally means 3 to 10 short sentences." If the complaint is that this article is an obvious dictionary definition, and stubs are supposed to at least define the title of the article that it seeks to have expanded, then it follows that the stub would be an obvious dictionary definition to start. -- backburner001 05:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed mergers

Since both Active fire protection and Passive fire protection are subsets of fire protection, I suggest that these two articles be merged into Fire protection. -- backburner001 00:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, subsequent discussions between backburner001 and myself, have resulted in expansions of both the AFP and PFP articles, which everyone now appears to agree can stand on their own. --Achim 03:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Since both [[Active fire protection]] and [[Passive fire protection]] are subsets of fire protection, I suggest that these two articles be merged into [[Fire protection]]. -- [[User:Backburner001|backburner001]] 00:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
+----
+For the record, subsequent discussions between [[User:Backburner001|backburner001]] and myself, have resulted in expansions of both the AFP and PFP articles, which everyone now appears to agree can stand on their own. --[[User:Ahering@cogeco.ca|Achim]] 03:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)