Canna Provisions v. Garland

Canna Provisions, Gyasi Sellers, Wiseacre Farm, Verano Holdings v. Merrick Garland is a lawsuit brought in late 2023 by cannabis industry entities against the U.S. Attorney General, arguing that the status of cannabis under the Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional. The suit was brought in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is one of the law firms representing the plaintiffs. Department of Justice moved to have the case dismissed, then later argued that the Federal Government had an interest in curtailing cannabis tourism between states. The case has been scheduled for oral arguments to occur on May 22, 2024.

Legal theory

The legal theory of the case is that although in Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court "reasoned that because Congress intended to 'eradicate' cannabis from interstate commerce, the federal government had a rational and thus lawful purpose in encroaching on states' cannabis regulation", this logic no longer pertains in the 2020s, as the Federal Government "continues to largely take a hands-off approach with regard to state-legal cannabis" under the Cole Memorandum and its successors, appropriations riders prohibiting federal enforcement activities against state medical cannabis programs, and other institutionalized practices. In the plaintiffs' words,

The federal government no longer operates under any assumption that banning intrastate marijuana is necessary to policing interstate marijuana... [and] long ago abandoned the goal of eliminating marijuana from commerce. Nor does Congress have any comprehensive—or even consistent and rational—approach to marijuana regulation. This inconsistent, patchwork approach to marijuana regulation provides no basis for Congress to regulate intrastate marijuana.

See also

• Legality of the War on Drugs

References

Sources

• Novak Jones, Diana (October 26, 2023). "Cannabis companies in Massachusetts challenge constitutionality of federal drug law". Reuters.
• Sullum, Jacob (November 7, 2023), "State-Licensed Pot Suppliers Say Federal Prohibition Is Unconstitutional As Applied to Them", Reason, A federal lawsuit argues that it is time to reassess the Commerce Clause rationale for banning intrastate marijuana production and distribution.
• Jaeger, Kyle (October 26, 2023). "Marijuana companies sue attorney general". Marijuana Moment.
• Miller, Cheryl (October 26, 2023). "Boies-Represented Cannabis Companies Sue Garland Over Federal Ban". Law.com.
• Michelle Simakis (November 17, 2023), "Another Path to Challenge Federal Cannabis Prohibition", Cannabis Business Times
• Zdinjak, Nina (January 23, 2024). "DOJ Seeks Dismissal Of Cannabis Industry Lawsuit Challenging Federal Marijuana Prohibition". Benzinga.
• Adlin, Ben (April 25, 2024). "Judge Schedules Oral Arguments In Marijuana Companies' Lawsuit Challenging Federal Prohibition". Marijuana Moment.
• McKillop, Daniel T. (November 21, 2023), New Federal Lawsuit Could Be Gamechanger For Cannabis Businesses, Mondaq
• Canna Provisions, Inc., Gyasi Sellers, Wiseacre Farm, Inc., Verano Holdings Corp., Plaintiffs, Against Merrick Garland, In His Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, document 23-cv-30113, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Western Division complaint

Further reading

• https://www.marijuanamoment.net/feds-and-marijuana-businesses-jointly-agree-on-deadline-extension-for-lawsuit-challenging-prohibition/
• Meghan Thompson (January 8, 2024). "ANALYSIS: Cannabis Lawsuit Targets Congress's Power Over Pot". Bloomberg Law.
• Joseph Bednar (January 19, 2024). "Lawsuit Seeks To Limit Federal Reach Into State-Legal Cannabis Industry". BusinessWest. Springfield, Mass.
• Bricken, Hilary (March 15, 2024), "CSA Case Could Shift Intrastate Commercial Cannabis", Law360 (subscription required)