Constant elasticity of substitution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 41.78.77.245 (talk) at 18:40, 26 November 2012 (→‎CES production function). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In economics, Constant elasticity of substitution (CES) is a property of some production functions and utility functions.

More precisely, it refers to a particular type of aggregator function which combines two or more types of consumption, or two or more types of productive inputs into an aggregate quantity. This aggregator function exhibits constant elasticity of substitution.

CES production function

document iri rakapenga by Clappy. The CES production function is a type of production function that displays constant elasticity of substitution. In other words, the production technology has a constant percentage change in factor (e.g. labour and capital) proportions due to a percentage change in marginal rate of technical substitution. The two factor (Capital, Labor) CES production function introduced by Solow [1] and later made popular by Arrow, Chenery, Minhas, and Solow is:[2][3][4]

where

  • = Output
  • = Factor productivity
  • = Share parameter
  • , = Primary production factors (Capital and Labor)
  • =
  • = = Elasticity of substitution.

As its name suggests, the CES production function exhibits constant elasticity of substitution between capital and labor. Leontief, linear and Cobb-Douglas production functions are special cases of the CES production function. That is, if we have a linear function 1, if approaches zero, in the limit we get the Cobb-Douglas function; and as approaches negative infinity we get the Leontief function. The general form of the CES production function is[5]:

where

  • = Output
  • = Factor productivity
  • = Share parameter of input i,
  • = Production factors (i = 1,2...n)
  • = Elasticity of substitution.

Extending the CES (Solow) form to accommodate multiple factors of production creates some problems, however. There is no completely general way to do this. Uzawa [6] showed the only possible n-factor production functions (n>2) with constant partial elasticities of substitution require either that all elasticities between pairs of factors be identical, or if any differ, these all must equal each other and all remaining elasticities must be unity. This is true for any production function. This means the use of the CES form for more than 2 factors will generally mean that there is not constant elasticity of substitution among all factors.

Nested CES functions are commonly found in partial/general equilibrium models. Different nests (levels) allow for the introduction of the appropriate elasticity of substitution.

The CES is a neoclassical production function.

CES utility function

The same functional form arises as a utility function in consumer theory. For example, if there exist types of consumption goods , then aggregate consumption could be defined using the CES aggregator:

Here again, the coefficients are share parameters, and is the elasticity of substitution. Therefore the consumption goods are perfect substitutes when approaches infinity and perfect complements when approaches zero. The CES aggregator is also sometimes called the Armington aggregator, which was discussed by Armington (1969).[7]

A CES utility function is one of the cases considered by Avinash Dixit and Joseph Stiglitz in their study of optimal product diversity in a context of monopolistic competition.[8]

References

  1. ^ Solow, R.M (1956). "A contribution to the theory of economic growth". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70: 65–94. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help)
  2. ^ Arrow, K. J. (1961). "Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency". Review of Economics and Statistics. 43 (3). The MIT Press: 225–250. doi:10.2307/1927286. JSTOR 1927286. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Jorgensen, Dale W. (2000). Econometrics, vol. 1: Econometric Modelling of Producer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 2. ISBN 0-262-10082-7. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  4. ^ Klump, R (2007). "Factor Substitution and Factor Augmenting Technical Progress in the US: A Normalized Supply-Side System Approach". Review of Economics and Statistics. 89 (1). The MIT Press: 183–192. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Courses/GraduateTheoryUCSB/elasticity%20of%20substitutionrevised.tex.pdf
  6. ^ Uzawa, H (1962). "Production functions with constant elasticities of substitution". Review of Economic Studies. 9: 291–299. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help)
  7. ^ Armington, P. S. (1969). "A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production". IMF Staff Papers. 16: 159–178. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |month= and |coauthors= (help)
  8. ^ Dixit, Avinash (1977). "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity". American Economic Review. 67 (3). American Economic Association: 297–308. JSTOR 1831401. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

External links