Jan Ambjørn: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
I have changed everything, since what was written was misleading and wrong.
Tags: possible unreferenced addition to BLP Visual edit
Address some issues and flag others
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Danish physicist}}
{{Short description|Danish physicist}}
{{Multiple issues|
Jan Ambjørn received his PhD in 1980 at the Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen. He was postdocs at Caltech and Nordita and employed at the Niels Bohr Institute from 1986,  and since1992 as professor in theoretical physics.  From 2003-2010 also professor at Utrecht University, the Netherlands,  and from 2012 also professor at Radboud University, the Netherlands.
{{BLP unsourced|date=October 2022}}
{{Autobiography|date=October 2022}} <!--JAphysicist "changed everything" in May 2022-->
}}
'''Jan Ambjørn''' is a Danish theoretical physicist. He received his PhD in 1980 at the [[Niels Bohr Institute]] in Copenhagen, followed by postdoctoral research positions at Caltech and Nordita. He has been employed at the Niels Bohr Institute from 1986, since 1992 as professor in theoretical physics.  From 2003 to 2010 he was also a professor at [[Utrecht University]], and since 2012 he has been a professor at [[Radboud University]], both in the Netherlands.


Ambjørn has worked on a large number of different topics. Below is a description of some. As a PhD student he worked together with his thesis adviser P.  Olesen  on understanding the vacuum structure of QCD, using a model called the Copenhagen Vacuum. Later they developed the theory of magnetism in the electroweak theory. It provides a very simple physical realisation of anti-screening, an effect associated with asymptotically free quantum field theories.
Ambjørn has worked on a large number of different topics. As a PhD student he worked together with his adviser P. Olesen on understanding the vacuum structure of QCD, using a model called the Copenhagen Vacuum. Later they developed the theory of magnetism in the electroweak theory. It provides a very simple physical realisation of anti-screening, an effect associated with asymptotically free quantum field theories.


Together with  B. Durhuus and J. Frohlich he proposed  a non-perturbative formulation of the boson string theory, using what became known as Dynamical Triangulations. Similar ideas was proposed by V. Kazakov, A. Migdal and I. Kostov and by F. David. The formalism provides a successful description of so-called non-critical strings, which can also be viewed as two-dimensional quantum gravity coupled to matter with a central charge c < 1. Using Dynamical triangulations, he and Y. Watabiki calculated the so-called two-point function of pure two-dimensional quantum gravity (c=0), a calculation made possible by the seminal work of  H. Kawai, N. Kawamoto, T. Mogami and  Y. Watabiki. The articles showed that the Hausdorff dimension of pure 2d gravity is 4.
Together with B. Durhuus and [[Jürg Fröhlich]] he proposed a non-perturbative formulation of the boson [[string theory]], using what became known as dynamical triangulation. The formalism provides a successful description of so-called non-critical strings, which can also be viewed as two-dimensional [[quantum gravity]] coupled to matter with a central charge c<1. Using dynamical triangulation, he and Y. Watabiki calculated the so-called two-point function of pure two-dimensional quantum gravity (c=0), showing that the [[Hausdorff dimension]] of pure 2d gravity is 4.


Ambjørn used Dynamical Triangulation to provide a lattice regularization of three- and four-dimensional quantum gravity. The hope was that a four-dimensional quantum theory of gravity  is asymptotic safe, with a non-perturbative UV fixed point, and that this fixed point could be found in the regularized lattice theory which then would provide  a non-perturbative well-defined theory of quantum gravity. While there are calculations supporting the idea of an UV fixed point in quantum gravity, it has been difficult to find higher order phase transition lines  in the lattice theory where this fixed point can located. Work in this direction is still ongoing.
Ambjørn used dynamical triangulation to provide a lattice regularization of three- and four-dimensional quantum gravity. The hope was that a four-dimensional quantum theory of gravity is asymptotically safe, with a non-perturbative UV fixed point, and that this fixed point could be found in the regularized lattice theory which then would provide a non-perturbative well-defined theory of quantum gravity. While there are calculations supporting the idea of an UV fixed point in quantum gravity, it has been difficult to find higher-order phase transition lines in the lattice theory where this fixed point can located.


Faced by the difficulties of finding second order phase transitions in the four-dimensional lattice gravity theory based on Dynamical Triangulations, Ambjørn and R. Loll suggested a modified lattice theory, now called Causal Dynamical Triangulations.The name refers to the fact that the time direction on the lattice is treated distinctly different from the spatial directions, by insisting that the (lattice) spacetimes which appear in the path integral  have a time foliation. The model was first proposed in two-dimensional spacetime, where it could be solved analytically, and later generalized to three and four dimensions by Ambjorn, Loll and J. Jurkiewicz. The higher dimensional models can be studied by computer simulations and  second order phase transition lines have been found. A UV fixed point can potentially by located on one of these lines. This is presently being investigated.
Faced by the difficulties of finding second-order phase transitions in the four-dimensional lattice gravity theory based on dynamical triangulation, Ambjørn and [[Renate Loll]] suggested a modified lattice theory, now called [[causal dynamical triangulation]]. The name refers to the fact that the time direction on the lattice is treated differently from the spatial directions, by insisting that the (lattice) spacetimes which appear in the path integral have a time foliation. The model was first proposed in two-dimensional spacetime, where it could be solved analytically, and later generalized to three and four dimensions by Ambjørn, Loll and J. Jurkiewicz. The higher-dimensional models can be studied by computer simulations and second-order phase transition lines have been found. A UV fixed point can potentially by located on one of these lines.


Jan Ambjørn has presently (2022) published 285 articles in refereed journals, 2 monographs and 70 proceeding contributions.
As of 2022, Ambjørn has published 285 articles in refereed journals, 2 monographs and 70 proceeding contributions.


==Sources==
==Sources==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
==External links==
* [https://inspirehep.net/authors/1018511 INSPIRE-HEP profile]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130727184237/http://www.nbi.dk/~ambjorn/lqg2/ Simulation of Lorentzian 2D Quantum Gravity]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130727184237/http://www.nbi.dk/~ambjorn/lqg2/ Simulation of Lorentzian 2D Quantum Gravity]


Line 22: Line 29:
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]



{{denmark-scientist-stub}}
{{denmark-scientist-stub}}

Revision as of 20:22, 28 October 2022

Jan Ambjørn is a Danish theoretical physicist. He received his PhD in 1980 at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, followed by postdoctoral research positions at Caltech and Nordita. He has been employed at the Niels Bohr Institute from 1986, since 1992 as professor in theoretical physics.  From 2003 to 2010 he was also a professor at Utrecht University, and since 2012 he has been a professor at Radboud University, both in the Netherlands.

Ambjørn has worked on a large number of different topics. As a PhD student he worked together with his adviser P. Olesen on understanding the vacuum structure of QCD, using a model called the Copenhagen Vacuum. Later they developed the theory of magnetism in the electroweak theory. It provides a very simple physical realisation of anti-screening, an effect associated with asymptotically free quantum field theories.

Together with B. Durhuus and Jürg Fröhlich he proposed a non-perturbative formulation of the boson string theory, using what became known as dynamical triangulation. The formalism provides a successful description of so-called non-critical strings, which can also be viewed as two-dimensional quantum gravity coupled to matter with a central charge c<1. Using dynamical triangulation, he and Y. Watabiki calculated the so-called two-point function of pure two-dimensional quantum gravity (c=0), showing that the Hausdorff dimension of pure 2d gravity is 4.

Ambjørn used dynamical triangulation to provide a lattice regularization of three- and four-dimensional quantum gravity. The hope was that a four-dimensional quantum theory of gravity is asymptotically safe, with a non-perturbative UV fixed point, and that this fixed point could be found in the regularized lattice theory which then would provide a non-perturbative well-defined theory of quantum gravity. While there are calculations supporting the idea of an UV fixed point in quantum gravity, it has been difficult to find higher-order phase transition lines in the lattice theory where this fixed point can located.

Faced by the difficulties of finding second-order phase transitions in the four-dimensional lattice gravity theory based on dynamical triangulation, Ambjørn and Renate Loll suggested a modified lattice theory, now called causal dynamical triangulation. The name refers to the fact that the time direction on the lattice is treated differently from the spatial directions, by insisting that the (lattice) spacetimes which appear in the path integral have a time foliation. The model was first proposed in two-dimensional spacetime, where it could be solved analytically, and later generalized to three and four dimensions by Ambjørn, Loll and J. Jurkiewicz. The higher-dimensional models can be studied by computer simulations and second-order phase transition lines have been found. A UV fixed point can potentially by located on one of these lines.

As of 2022, Ambjørn has published 285 articles in refereed journals, 2 monographs and 70 proceeding contributions.

Sources

External links