Markus Gabriel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by DerAnsager (talk) to last version by NorthBySouthBaranof
What counts as a reliable source [...] The type of the work (some examples include a document, an article, or a book) Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
Line 29: Line 29:


::I try to revive the tradition of metaontology and metametaphysics that departs from Kant. As has been noticed, Heidegger introduced the term metaontology and he also clearly states that Kant’s philosophy is a “metaphysics about metaphysics.” I call metametaphysical nihilism the view that there is no such thing as the world such that questions regarding its ultimate nature, essence, structure, composition, categorical outlines etc. are devoid of the intended conceptual content. The idea that there is a big thing comprising absolutely everything is an illusion, albeit neither a natural one nor an inevitable feature of reason as such. Of course, there is an influential Neo-Carnapian strand in the contemporary debate which comes to similar conclusions. I agree with a lot of what is going on in this area of research and I try to combine it with the metaontological/metametaphysical tradition of Kantian and Post-Kantian philosophy.<ref>http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/why-the-world-does-not-exist-but-unicorns-do/</ref>
::I try to revive the tradition of metaontology and metametaphysics that departs from Kant. As has been noticed, Heidegger introduced the term metaontology and he also clearly states that Kant’s philosophy is a “metaphysics about metaphysics.” I call metametaphysical nihilism the view that there is no such thing as the world such that questions regarding its ultimate nature, essence, structure, composition, categorical outlines etc. are devoid of the intended conceptual content. The idea that there is a big thing comprising absolutely everything is an illusion, albeit neither a natural one nor an inevitable feature of reason as such. Of course, there is an influential Neo-Carnapian strand in the contemporary debate which comes to similar conclusions. I agree with a lot of what is going on in this area of research and I try to combine it with the metaontological/metametaphysical tradition of Kantian and Post-Kantian philosophy.<ref>http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/why-the-world-does-not-exist-but-unicorns-do/</ref>

==Controversy==
A romanian philosopher called Gabriel Vacariu accused him 2013 in a paper of plagirism.<ref>http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gvacariu/Did%20Markus%20Gabriel%20plagiarized%20my%20ideas.pdf</ref> The accusations however where refuted by Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg (University Bonn).<ref>http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/About-complain-regarding-Markus-Gabriels-plagiarism-Bonn-University-notification.pdf</ref> Gabriel Vacariu still holds the view that he consciously copied his work and renamed his "EDWs" (epistemologically different worlds) into "Sinnfelder" (Fields of senses).<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLpzaaSE8L8</ref>


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==

Revision as of 16:53, 24 October 2016

Markus Gabriel
Born (1980-04-06) April 6, 1980 (age 44)
Era21st-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolSpeculative realism Relationalism Syntheism

Markus Gabriel (born April 6, 1980) is a German philosopher and author at the University of Bonn. In addition to his more specialized work, he has also written popular books about philosophical issues.

Career

Gabriel was educated in philosophy and Ancient Greek in Germany. After completing his studies, he held a faculty position at New School for Social Research. He then came to the University of Bonn, where he holds the Chair for Epistemology, Modern and Contemporary Philosophy and is Director of the International Centre for Philosophy.[1] Gabriel has also been a visiting professor at University of California, Berkeley.[2]

Philosophy

In 2013, Gabriel wrote Transcendental Ontology: Essays in German Idealism. In the Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Sebastian Gardner wrote that the work is "Gabriel's most comprehensive presentation to date, in English, of his reading of German Idealism"[3] and notes that "due to its compression of a wealth of ideas into such a short space, the book demands quite a lot from its readers."[3]

In an interview, Gabriel complained that "most contemporary metaphysicians are [sloppy] when it comes to characterizing their subject matter," using words like "the world" and "reality" "often...interchangeably and without further clarifications. In my view, those totality of words do not refer to anything which is capable of having the property of existence."[4] He goes on to explain:

I try to revive the tradition of metaontology and metametaphysics that departs from Kant. As has been noticed, Heidegger introduced the term metaontology and he also clearly states that Kant’s philosophy is a “metaphysics about metaphysics.” I call metametaphysical nihilism the view that there is no such thing as the world such that questions regarding its ultimate nature, essence, structure, composition, categorical outlines etc. are devoid of the intended conceptual content. The idea that there is a big thing comprising absolutely everything is an illusion, albeit neither a natural one nor an inevitable feature of reason as such. Of course, there is an influential Neo-Carnapian strand in the contemporary debate which comes to similar conclusions. I agree with a lot of what is going on in this area of research and I try to combine it with the metaontological/metametaphysical tradition of Kantian and Post-Kantian philosophy.[5]

Controversy

A romanian philosopher called Gabriel Vacariu accused him 2013 in a paper of plagirism.[6] The accusations however where refuted by Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg (University Bonn).[7] Gabriel Vacariu still holds the view that he consciously copied his work and renamed his "EDWs" (epistemologically different worlds) into "Sinnfelder" (Fields of senses).[8]

Bibliography

  • Der Mensch im Mythos: Untersuchungen über Ontotheologie, Anthropologie und Selbstbewusstseinsgeschichte in Schellings „Philosophie der Mythologie“. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York City 2006, ISBN 978-3-11-019036-6.
  • An den Grenzen der Erkenntnistheorie. Die notwendige Endlichkeit des objektiven Wissens als Lektion des Skeptizismus. Karl Alber, Freiburg i. Br./München 2008. ISBN 978-3-495-48318-3.
  • Antike und moderne Skepsis zur Einführung. Junius, Hamburg 2008, ISBN 3-88506-649-1.
  • Zus. mit Slavoj Žižek: Mythology, Madness, and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism. Continuum: New York/London 2009
  • Skeptizismus und Idealismus in der Antike. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 2009. ISBN 978-3-518-29519-9.
  • Die Erkenntnis der Welt. Eine Einführung in die Erkenntnistheorie. Karl Alber, Freiburg i. Br./München 2012. ISBN 978-3-495-48522-4.
  • Warum es die Welt nicht gibt. Ullstein, Berlin 2013, ISBN 978-3-550-08010-4. (Why the World does not Exist, Polity Press, 2015, ISBN 9780745687568)
  • Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 2015, ISBN 978-0-7486-9289-7.

References

  1. ^ "Prof. Dr. Markus Gabriel". Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
  2. ^ "Markus Gabriel's Courses". University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
  3. ^ a b Gardner, Sebastian. "Transcendental Ontology: Essays in German Idealism (review)". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
  4. ^ http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/why-the-world-does-not-exist-but-unicorns-do/
  5. ^ http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/why-the-world-does-not-exist-but-unicorns-do/
  6. ^ http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gvacariu/Did%20Markus%20Gabriel%20plagiarized%20my%20ideas.pdf
  7. ^ http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/About-complain-regarding-Markus-Gabriels-plagiarism-Bonn-University-notification.pdf
  8. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLpzaaSE8L8

External links