User contributions for CutePeach
A user with 1,782 edits. Account created on 15 March 2021.
18 March 2021
- 02:4702:47, 18 March 2021 diff hist +4 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation →Split the "Wuhan lab leak story" section into: "accidental leak" and "engineered as a bio-weapon" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:4401:44, 18 March 2021 diff hist +1,256 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation →Split the "Wuhan lab leak story" section into: "accidental leak" and "engineered as a bio-weapon" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
17 March 2021
- 18:2318:23, 17 March 2021 diff hist +652 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation →Split the "Wuhan lab leak story" section into: "accidental leak" and "engineered as a bio-weapon" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:5217:52, 17 March 2021 diff hist +79 Dengvaxia controversy No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:4417:44, 17 March 2021 diff hist 0 Talk:Origin of COVID-19 →Scope and subject of this article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:4017:40, 17 March 2021 diff hist +5 Talk:Origin of COVID-19 →Scope and subject of this article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:3017:30, 17 March 2021 diff hist +779 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation →Split the "Wuhan lab leak story" section into: "accidental leak" and "engineered as a bio-weapon" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:4102:41, 17 March 2021 diff hist −625 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:3902:39, 17 March 2021 diff hist +568 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation →Split the "Wuhan lab leak story" section into: "accidental leak" and "engineered as a bio-weapon" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:2202:22, 17 March 2021 diff hist −115 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:1902:19, 17 March 2021 diff hist +86 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation can you add this to the end: ::::The two hypotheses should not be treated as the same. The WHO does not treat them as the same and WHO mission chief Peter Embarek clarified the unfortunate "extremely unlikely" wording in his interview with Science magazine. Embarek even said that calling the hypothesis "extremely unlikely" is an "accomplishment" because previously it was "impossible": https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/02/politics-was-always-room-who-mission-chief-reflects-china-trip-seekin... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:1702:17, 17 March 2021 diff hist +86 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:1502:15, 17 March 2021 diff hist +567 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:5701:57, 17 March 2021 diff hist −5 Gain-of-function research No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 March 2021
- 14:4314:43, 16 March 2021 diff hist +237 Talk:Origin of COVID-19 →Scope and subject of this article: @Whatamidoing, I think the scope and subject of this page will remain a challenge as WHO mission chief Peter Embarek recently tweeted that his study is not an investigation: https://twitter.com/Peterfoodsafety/status/1368322592063557639 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit