User contributions for Scribolt

31 October 2023

• 08:2808:28, 31 October 2023 diff hist −23‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎So what does this mean and how does this help?
• 08:2708:27, 31 October 2023 diff hist +1,225‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎So what does all of this mean and how does this help?: update
• 07:1207:12, 31 October 2023 diff hist −36‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎Defining some terms
• 07:1107:11, 31 October 2023 diff hist −292‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats: tweaks

18 October 2023

• 13:0113:01, 18 October 2023 diff hist −207‎ Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue ‎ As per talk

16 October 2023

• 08:2008:20, 16 October 2023 diff hist +261‎ Wikipedia talk:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue ‎ →‎Dispute over citing this page: looks good

14 October 2023

• 11:5311:53, 14 October 2023 diff hist −7‎ Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue ‎ As you mentioned in your first edit summary, you made a bold edit. It's been reverted. Please discuss on the talk page. Tag: Undo

13 October 2023

• 16:0416:04, 13 October 2023 diff hist −7‎ Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue ‎ Even in that unlikely event, citing this essay wouldn't be a helpful, and without any caveats I don't see any benefit to softening the language here. Tags: Undo Reverted

10 October 2023

• 14:0414:04, 10 October 2023 diff hist +1,172‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats: saving
• 14:0114:01, 10 October 2023 diff hist +265‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎Defining some terms: add
• 13:4613:46, 10 October 2023 diff hist +958‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
• 12:2912:29, 10 October 2023 diff hist +503‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ →‎Some common but not universally accepted assumptions and related caveats
• 12:1912:19, 10 October 2023 diff hist +3,384‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ more
• 11:1311:13, 10 October 2023 diff hist −499‎ User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ restart
• 05:4305:43, 10 October 2023 diff hist +94‎ N User:Scribolt/Establishing the current consensus ‎ Scribolt moved page User:Scribolt/Establishing the current consensus to User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus: Change of scope current Tag: New redirect
• 05:4305:43, 10 October 2023 diff hist 0‎ m User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus ‎ Scribolt moved page User:Scribolt/Establishing the current consensus to User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus: Change of scope

4 October 2023

• 17:0817:08, 4 October 2023 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎Reset: again
• 17:0617:06, 4 October 2023 diff hist −212‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎Reset: rephrase
• 17:0117:01, 4 October 2023 diff hist +1‎ m Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎Reset: indent
• 17:0117:01, 4 October 2023 diff hist +521‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎Reset: reply

3 October 2023

• 15:0615:06, 3 October 2023 diff hist +574‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎Reset: reply
• 07:4907:49, 3 October 2023 diff hist +4‎ m Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎Reset: ce
• 07:4807:48, 3 October 2023 diff hist +2,196‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: try again

26 September 2023

• 10:4310:43, 26 September 2023 diff hist −21‎ The Terminator ‎ Undid revision 1177157152 by 2A01:827:200:6801:BD3C:EF0D:FEA4:8038 (talk) Tag: Undo

22 September 2023

• 08:5208:52, 22 September 2023 diff hist +352‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: reply

21 September 2023

• 14:1214:12, 21 September 2023 diff hist +1,685‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: reply

20 September 2023

• 11:5711:57, 20 September 2023 diff hist +1,928‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: revise

19 September 2023

• 09:1409:14, 19 September 2023 diff hist −4‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: clarify
• 07:1007:10, 19 September 2023 diff hist −2‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: ce
• 07:0707:07, 19 September 2023 diff hist +1,286‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: suggestion

15 September 2023

• 16:0616:06, 15 September 2023 diff hist −180‎ Nocturne ‎ →‎History: this is a rather substantial claim, covering all salon music in a century and should be sourced

15 August 2023

• 06:0506:05, 15 August 2023 diff hist +14‎ Dune (2021 film) ‎ →‎Plot: clarify

31 July 2023

• 15:4915:49, 31 July 2023 diff hist +12‎ ZombiU ‎ →‎Design: re write a bit. It wasn't because of the Olympics, it's because it was getting attention. Also, I agree that the previous version was unclear, in terms what the 'theme' was.

28 July 2023

• 16:0016:00, 28 July 2023 diff hist +1,528‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: another ramble

26 July 2023

• 18:1218:12, 26 July 2023 diff hist +14‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: important change, this is why venues end up being important as a corellary of advertising correctly
• 18:0818:08, 26 July 2023 diff hist +940‎ Wikipedia talk:Consensus ‎ →‎CONLEVEL as any level that agrees with me: thoughts

18 July 2023

• 13:1113:11, 18 July 2023 diff hist −30‎ The Guardian ‎ hopefully I didn't break anything. As per talk, that citation does not relate to the the political alignment of the publication, but the readership and is not helpful here.
• 13:0413:04, 18 July 2023 diff hist +1,901‎ Talk:The Guardian ‎ →‎Is Center-Left Appropriate?: last reply

17 July 2023

• 07:0207:02, 17 July 2023 diff hist −1‎ m Talk:The Guardian ‎ →‎Is Center-Left Appropriate?: typo
• 06:5706:57, 17 July 2023 diff hist +394‎ Talk:The Guardian ‎ →‎Is Center-Left Appropriate?: reply (and correct some indenting so Amschinds reply is in the right place)
• 06:2906:29, 17 July 2023 diff hist +1,824‎ Talk:The Guardian ‎ →‎Is Center-Left Appropriate?: reply

14 July 2023

• 16:2816:28, 14 July 2023 diff hist +4‎ The Guardian ‎ Please wait for consensus on the talk page. Not sure I agree with your edit summary, of the sources I opened, the BBC article said left leaning, the yougov poll showed that it was regarded as slightly left of centre and payling used centre left Tags: Undo Reverted

2 July 2023

• 15:3415:34, 2 July 2023 diff hist +224‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film ‎ →‎Plot or Synopsis section: add a policy link as well

26 June 2023

• 06:4606:46, 26 June 2023 diff hist −54‎ Edge of Tomorrow ‎ →‎Plot: remove overlinking of commonly understood terms. Re the private rank, unless we link every rank mentioned, I don't see why we should do this

23 June 2023

• 07:2007:20, 23 June 2023 diff hist −6‎ The Terminator ‎ Undid revision 1161509595 by 2603:6011:D400:5E46:1CAB:9B4A:BDB5:C49 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 07:1807:18, 23 June 2023 diff hist +4,027‎ Wikipedia talk:Source your plot summaries ‎ →‎A heads up: new section current Tag: New topic
• 05:5705:57, 23 June 2023 diff hist −80‎ Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction ‎ Undid revision 1161077234 by Scribolt (talk) No objections for a few days on talk Tag: Undo

20 June 2023

• 13:5813:58, 20 June 2023 diff hist +47‎ m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction ‎ →‎What precisely do we want to "encourage" re plot summary sourcing?: copy paste error
• 13:5713:57, 20 June 2023 diff hist −1‎ m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction ‎ →‎What precisely do we want to "encourage" re plot summary sourcing?: weird line break
• 13:5613:56, 20 June 2023 diff hist +300‎ Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction ‎ →‎What precisely do we want to "encourage" re plot summary sourcing?: minor tidy up of my mangled sentence earlier and a proposal