Talk:Mesrop Mashtots: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Writing systems tag
Jaqeli (talk | contribs)
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


The article on it has sources backing Mesrop's credit (although it is noted that a number of Georgian scholars think otherwise).
The article on it has sources backing Mesrop's credit (although it is noted that a number of Georgian scholars think otherwise).

== Propagandist statements ==

Wikipedia is not a place for a blatant statements about issues which are not an established facts. Thus removing the statement about Georgian and Albanian alphabets. None of them were created by Mesrop. It's an Armenian tradition which states so and it in no way can be thought to be strictly true as the issue is way too much controversial. Per [[Georgian scripts]] you cannot have such statement into the article. Thanks. [[User talk:Jaqeli|Jaqeli]] 10:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:57, 16 July 2014

WikiProject iconWriting systems B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Georgian alphabet as well?

The article on it has sources backing Mesrop's credit (although it is noted that a number of Georgian scholars think otherwise).

Propagandist statements

Wikipedia is not a place for a blatant statements about issues which are not an established facts. Thus removing the statement about Georgian and Albanian alphabets. None of them were created by Mesrop. It's an Armenian tradition which states so and it in no way can be thought to be strictly true as the issue is way too much controversial. Per Georgian scripts you cannot have such statement into the article. Thanks. Jaqeli 10:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]