Talk:École secondaire Étienne-Brûlé
Schools Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Toronto Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Etienne brule logo.gif
Image:Etienne brule logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Request to lock this page
I am a former student of this school, and I think it is disgusting what the current students have done to this page. Being a school, there are the students and faculty who would wish to add constructive content to this page, and there are the students who just want to have a laugh and vandalise the page. As such, I suggest locking this page so that one must have an account to edit it (the same sort of restrictions imposed on pages with sensitive content, but to a lesser extent).
This article used to be over a page long and contained legitimate information about the school and its extra-curricular work, but this information has since been progressively replaced by immature comments. Bosticko (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- I second this suggestion. Only a couple of years ago, this page was of considerable length and of respectable quality; however, today, I surprising found little more than a sentence on this page. I believe this article would greatly benefit from the protection suggested by Bosticko.