Talk:261 (number): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:11, 5 March 2022

Articles for creation Stub‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 November 2017 by reviewer Adotchar (talk · contribs).

Numbers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles

Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Comments

This is a talk page for the corresponding encyclopedia page. Mynameisbob1234567890 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Mynameisbob1234567890[reply]

Boston marathon

User Arthur Rubin seems to have a personal thing against including the 1967 Boston marathon bib number of Kathrine Switzer, and has repeatedly reverted edits which included it. This is an article about random facts of a number, there is hardly any reason why a historical fact could be considered "unimportant" or worse "insignificant" [sic] as said in the edits. IMHO seems very misogynist, but in even without considering that, it is obviously not justified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miguelsxvi (talk • contribs) 18:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We no longer have guidelines, other than WP:NOTINFINITE but it is very insignificant. It's also misplaced on the page, if it were to be included. Needs to be a level 4 or deeper header, and under "Miscellaneous". It's also not sourced. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:10, 5 March 2022 edit Arthur Rubin (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 130,165 edits →‎Boston marathon: insignificant, misplaced, unsourced ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:11, 5 March 2022 edit undo Arthur Rubin (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 130,165 edits →‎Boston marathon: typo Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	User Arthur Rubin seems to have a personal thing against including the 1967 Boston marathon bib number of Kathrine Switzer, and has repeatedly reverted edits which included it. This is an article about random facts of a number, there is hardly any reason why a historical fact could be considered "unimportant" or worse "insignificant" [sic] as said in the edits. IMHO seems very misogynist, but in even without considering that, it is obviously not justified. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Miguelsxvi\|Miguelsxvi]] ([[User talk:Miguelsxvi#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miguelsxvi\|contribs]]) 18:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		User Arthur Rubin seems to have a personal thing against including the 1967 Boston marathon bib number of Kathrine Switzer, and has repeatedly reverted edits which included it. This is an article about random facts of a number, there is hardly any reason why a historical fact could be considered "unimportant" or worse "insignificant" [sic] as said in the edits. IMHO seems very misogynist, but in even without considering that, it is obviously not justified. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Miguelsxvi\|Miguelsxvi]] ([[User talk:Miguelsxvi#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miguelsxvi\|contribs]]) 18:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:We no longer have guidelines, other than [[WP:~~INFINITE~~]] but it is '''very''' insignificant. It's also misplaced on the page, if it were to be included. Needs to be a level 4 or deeper header, and under "Miscellaneous". It's also not sourced. — [[User:Arthur Rubin\|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin\|(talk)]] 02:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)		:We no longer have guidelines, other than [[WP:NOTINFINITE]] but it is '''very''' insignificant. It's also misplaced on the page, if it were to be included. Needs to be a level 4 or deeper header, and under "Miscellaneous". It's also not sourced. — [[User:Arthur Rubin\|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin\|(talk)]] 02:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)