Talk:261 (number): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Boston marathon: included in the organization listing
Line 13: Line 13:
:We no longer have guidelines, other than [[WP:NOTINFINITE]] but it is '''very''' insignificant. It's also misplaced on the page, if it were to be included. Needs to be a level 4 or deeper header, and under "Miscellaneous". It's also not sourced. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 02:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
:We no longer have guidelines, other than [[WP:NOTINFINITE]] but it is '''very''' insignificant. It's also misplaced on the page, if it were to be included. Needs to be a level 4 or deeper header, and under "Miscellaneous". It's also not sourced. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 02:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
:Apparently, the relevant guideline is [[WP:NUM#Numbers in sports]]. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 02:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
:Apparently, the relevant guideline is [[WP:NUM#Numbers in sports]]. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 02:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
:... and it's sufficiently included with the organization 261 Fearless. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 22:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:04, 5 March 2022

Comments

This is a talk page for the corresponding encyclopedia page. Mynameisbob1234567890 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Mynameisbob1234567890[reply]

Boston marathon

User Arthur Rubin seems to have a personal thing against including the 1967 Boston marathon bib number of Kathrine Switzer, and has repeatedly reverted edits which included it. This is an article about random facts of a number, there is hardly any reason why a historical fact could be considered "unimportant" or worse "insignificant" [sic] as said in the edits. IMHO seems very misogynist, but in even without considering that, it is obviously not justified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miguelsxvi (talkcontribs) 18:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We no longer have guidelines, other than WP:NOTINFINITE but it is very insignificant. It's also misplaced on the page, if it were to be included. Needs to be a level 4 or deeper header, and under "Miscellaneous". It's also not sourced. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, the relevant guideline is WP:NUM#Numbers in sports. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
... and it's sufficiently included with the organization 261 Fearless. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]