Talk:Biotin deficiency

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BennBluee (talk | contribs) at 02:43, 19 June 2023 (→‎Possible References Section: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMedicine: Dermatology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Article categorization

This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References a mess

What is here is a mess. The numbered refs (1-16) are incomplete. After those there is a long list, not numbered, alphabetical, and in all likelihood copied from another source. Some of these are duplicates of the initial 1-16.David notMD (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 16 to biotin deficiency in pregnancy is inaccurate. There is no mention of biotin levels in pregnant patients in the cited publication . The study is a trial of bioavailability of biotin in IV and oral formulations and in fact pregnant patients were excluded from the study. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.131.10.133 (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible References Section

I have gone through the article and added references. Can the "possible references" section at the bottom of the page hence be deleted now? Or should it be left there anyway? BennBluee (talk) 02:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]