Talk:Blackpool Combat Club: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chameleon. (talk | contribs) →Timetable: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Could someone please fix the end time for William Regal's BCC involvement since the membership has been edited to him being "former"? Thank you. [[User:Chameleon.|Chameleon.]] ([[User talk:Chameleon.|talk]]) 08:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC) |
Could someone please fix the end time for William Regal's BCC involvement since the membership has been edited to him being "former"? Thank you. [[User:Chameleon.|Chameleon.]] ([[User talk:Chameleon.|talk]]) 08:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Associates == |
|||
Stop deleting the associates when the BCC have had associates just like every other pro wrestling factions, and stop using the whole "un-sourced" thing as excuse when alot of these pro wrestling factions don't have "sources" with their associates. [[User:ForrestFuller|ForrestFuller]] ([[User talk:ForrestFuller|talk]]) 00:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:09, 30 June 2023
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Timetable
Could someone please fix the end time for William Regal's BCC involvement since the membership has been edited to him being "former"? Thank you. Chameleon. (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Associates
Stop deleting the associates when the BCC have had associates just like every other pro wrestling factions, and stop using the whole "un-sourced" thing as excuse when alot of these pro wrestling factions don't have "sources" with their associates. ForrestFuller (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)