Talk:Columbia Island (New York): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m WPNY/subproject assessment per WP:WPNY/A using AWB
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Hudson Valley|class=stub|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Hudson Valley|class=stub|importance=Mid}}
<!-- {{ConfirmationOTRS|source=www.newrochellenews.info|otrs=2009103110013893}} -->
<!-- {{ConfirmationOTRS|source=www.newrochellenews.info|otrs=2009103110013893}} -->
There reads: ''"The island varies in size from about one acre to 175 square feet depending on the tide."''<br />
[[Acre]] article tells me that acre equals 43,560 sq ft, so it gets ~250 times bigger at low tide? And if Google Maps is right, the building/structure is over 100 ft long in both directions, so it is way over 10,000 sq ft (about 1/4 acres), I'd say about 1/2 acres. This is of course original research, but if that 175 sq ft figure is correct, then the structure must be partly under water at high tide. [[Special:Contributions/85.217.42.90|85.217.42.90]] ([[User talk:85.217.42.90|talk]]) 03:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:55, 4 September 2013

WikiProject iconNew York (state): Hudson Valley Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Mid-importance).

There reads: "The island varies in size from about one acre to 175 square feet depending on the tide."
Acre article tells me that acre equals 43,560 sq ft, so it gets ~250 times bigger at low tide? And if Google Maps is right, the building/structure is over 100 ft long in both directions, so it is way over 10,000 sq ft (about 1/4 acres), I'd say about 1/2 acres. This is of course original research, but if that 175 sq ft figure is correct, then the structure must be partly under water at high tide. 85.217.42.90 (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]