Talk:Cyclone Hollanda: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+{{hurricane}}
I'm in it to win it
Line 1: Line 1:
{{hurricane|class=C|importance=Low|storms-task-force=Yes}}
{{hurricane|class=C|importance=Low|storms-task-force=Yes}}
[[Talk:Cyclone Hollanda/News]] - here is the full version of the news articles used in the articles
[[Talk:Cyclone Hollanda/News]] - here is the full version of the news articles used in the articles
{{GA nominee|15:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)|nominator=♫ [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) |page=1|subtopic=Meteorology and atmospheric sciences|status=|note=}}


==Todo==
==Todo==

Revision as of 15:20, 4 October 2011

Template:Hurricane Talk:Cyclone Hollanda/News - here is the full version of the news articles used in the articles

Todo

Not too bad for an article in that basin, but some more work is needed. Inline sourcing would be good. The storm history should provide the entire meteorological history of the storm. Most of the data in the current storm history would probably be more appropriate for the impact section. Likewise, it'd be nice if the impact was expanded more, though I realize that might be difficult for the time period. Question - how come you included a link to Typhoon Tip and List of most intense tropical cyclones in the see also section? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The MH section look like the impact section. Hurricane Typhoon Cyclone 21:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency

The highest wind information in the infobox and Met history section seem to be contradictory. Which one is the right one? --Izmir2 Let's talk 23:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I changed it to reflect what the Infobox said. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]