Talk:Fani Willis/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Willis ADMITS to having affair with Wade while he was still married

Please add this to article, [1]https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4444973-trump-rails-against-fani-willis-after-she-admits-relationship-with-prosecutor/ 2603:8080:3E00:671:1D9B:A302:56D:E744 (talk) 21:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Nothing in that link refers to the affair happening when Wade was still married. Most of it is about Trump complaining about Willis. As for Willis and Wade's affair appearing in the article, it's there now. Paris1127 (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

THIS article states it was an affair that happened before the divorce, but after he was hired as SP. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13039147/Fani-Willis-ADMITS-affair-prosecutor-Nathan-Wade-Embattled-DA-confirms-relationship-rejects-salacious-claims-improper-impact-Trump-case.html 2603:8080:3E00:671:1D9B:A302:56D:E744 (talk) 22:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I see nothing in that article to that effect. Do you have a better source? Wikipedia does not consider The Daily Mail a reliable source (see WP:DAILYMAIL). Paris1127 (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

the inclusion by KiharaNoukan

does not address when they began a relationship and suggests it may have been a condition of employment

KiharaNoukan soibangla (talk) 06:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Are we seeing the same edits? There's nothing about "condition of employment" and both my edits say appointed, ie. past tense. The "when" is listed as 2022, which was there prior to my edit.

First diff: In 2022, Willis began dating Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor who she appointed to lead the Georgia election interference prosecution.

Second diff, where I added another past participle: In 2022, Willis began dating Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor who she had appointed to lead the Georgia election interference prosecution

Per cited CNN article: Willis appointed Wade special prosecutor in 2021. KiharaNoukan (talk) 07:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I perceive insinuation by omission of context that does not belong in a BLP soibangla (talk) 07:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

If someone was appointed already, that would insinuate that it would not be a "condition" of something that was beginning afterwards. Ex: "I began to pet my dog, who I had taken for a walk." I cannot condition the walk on my petting the dog, since I had already taken it for a walk.

I put another edit to show the appointment year and attribute Willis's statement of when relationship started. If this isn't enough, I'm not sure how much more it can be clear the temporal relationship can be between a relationship beginning in 2022 and an appointment in 2021.

If anything, the only omissions that were there were the ones that would otherwise insinuate what you claim. ie. the disputed start date of the relationship, which was represented in wikivoice. Per AJC: Her filing infers that Willis’ and Wade’s personal relationship began in 2019, two years before he was appointed special prosecutor. I attributed Willis's statement on start date to remedy this omission. KiharaNoukan (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

"I began to pet my dog" is quite a weird analogy that inclines me to stop reading right there. That's all I got here. soibangla (talk) 08:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)