Talk:Li Bai: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:


[[User:Bathrobe|Bathrobe]] 02:26, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
[[User:Bathrobe|Bathrobe]] 02:26, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

:PLEAESPLEASE leave 'Li Po' in a highly visible place. I don't know any-thing about Chinese, but I know I love (the English translations of) Li Po's poetry. I want to be able to find him without puzzling through some text.
- An outsider.


== Mercury & homeland ==
== Mercury & homeland ==

Revision as of 04:48, 12 November 2005

Spelling

I've changed all the references to "Li Po"; I'd prefer "Li Bai", but we need to be consistent. --Markalexander100 03:54, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Actually, I prefer "Li Bo". Spencer195 08:40, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Better than Li Po. :) Markalexander100 08:51, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
The narrator of the movie at the China pavilion at Epcot seems to be saying "Li Bao." ♥ «Charles A. L.» 19:34, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
You probably heard Li Bai. That's what I've always heard in Taiwan as well. --Menchi 20:10, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

i strongly propose a name change of this article to "Li Bai". Wade-Giles was previously used because the Chinese lacked a unified system of transliterate their language to English. But with the establishment of pinyin, the problem has been solved and we should stick to that. Objections anyone? --Plastictv 20:00, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

this is a no-brainer, I moved the page. LG-犬夜叉 00:37, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you :) --Plastictv 06:02, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I've (1) added 'Li Po' to the top as this is the name the poet is traditionally known by in English; (2) added an explanation of why Li Po is no longer used -- and this is not simply a matter of Wade Giles. If you would check a few sources, you would find that bó is a 读音 reading of 白; (3) removed the Simplified Chinese/Traditional Chinese character pairs since the two are identical here anyway. The result, I hope, is to clean up the clutter at the head of the article and to reassure people who are used to Li Po that they are not somehow politically incorrect and explain why his name has been changed.

Bathrobe 02:26, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PLEAESPLEASE leave 'Li Po' in a highly visible place. I don't know any-thing about Chinese, but I know I love (the English translations of) Li Po's poetry. I want to be able to find him without puzzling through some text.
 - An outsider.

Mercury & homeland

I also toned down the mercury poisoning theory less forceful- I think it's one theory rather than generally accepted. Similarly with his birthplace- as far as I know, it's most likely that he was somewhere further west than modern Sichuan. Markalexander100 03:54, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Influence

Firstly, Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_terms. Saying he was influential just repeats the intro. Markalexander100 08:30, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Question: Why are the Chinese characters in bold? I haven't seen many other pages that practice this, and, frankly, it makes the characters slightly (not badly, but still) difficult to read. --Golbez 06:43, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, it's difficult to read. Changed. --Menchi 06:57, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Wade-Giles

i'm very inclined to entirely remove the table of different versions of Li Bai's name on the right. However, i'm kept from doing so because many Western audiences are more familiar with his Wade-Giles name "Li Po" or "Li Pai" rather than his pinyin name. Suggestions anyone? --Plastictv 06:29, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think you're going too far. Pretty much every page about a historical Chinese figure has a section called "Names" listing the many ways to transliterate the name of that person. It can't be helped. There's no real reason to remove it though, it doesn't do any harm to have all the other names listed for posterity. Wikipedia doesn't charge by the page. --Carl 03:16, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
You definitely should not remove that information. Wikipedia articles on Chinese figure provide all major transliterations of names. —Lowellian (reply) 19:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]