Talk:List of biological wikis: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Nice work!: new section |
A comment: only a few biological wikis are sustainable which brings people to wikipedia as the only centralized resource |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Cheers, --[[User:dmb000006|Dan]]|<sup>[[User_talk:Dmb000006|(talk)]]</sup> 12:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC) |
Cheers, --[[User:dmb000006|Dan]]|<sup>[[User_talk:Dmb000006|(talk)]]</sup> 12:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
:We need to provide some text about biological wikis, with references to publications about individual wikis and the subject in general per [[WP:RS]] and to show notability of the subject. It's fine to provide link to the conference. My personal opinion: only a few biological wikis are sustainable (I like [http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/MicrobeWiki that one] which is based on the active student participation model), which brings people to wikipedia as the only centralized resource.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 14:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:40, 6 November 2010
This page does include a number of other existing pages, PDBWiki, NeuroLex, MetaBase, SNPedia and others. Not a valid reason for deletion.Biophys (talk) 16:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Not too many publications ... [1]. Biophys (talk) 19:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Nice work!
How to best 'syndicate' this list?
Cheers, --Dan|(talk) 12:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- We need to provide some text about biological wikis, with references to publications about individual wikis and the subject in general per WP:RS and to show notability of the subject. It's fine to provide link to the conference. My personal opinion: only a few biological wikis are sustainable (I like that one which is based on the active student participation model), which brings people to wikipedia as the only centralized resource.Biophys (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)