Talk:Microcrystalline cellulose: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jenkstom (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jenkstom (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
4/18/16. RandalwikiM has challenged a producer of supplements on the size and safety of the microcrystalline cellulose in their products. He is awaiting their response. ;) <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:RandalwikiM|RandalwikiM]] ([[User talk:RandalwikiM|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RandalwikiM|contribs]]) 04:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
4/18/16. RandalwikiM has challenged a producer of supplements on the size and safety of the microcrystalline cellulose in their products. He is awaiting their response. ;) <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:RandalwikiM|RandalwikiM]] ([[User talk:RandalwikiM|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RandalwikiM|contribs]]) 04:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I have added a link to original research done for a patient in 2012. You may call or write the clinic to verify this information (I presume, I did not ask permission). I have removed the "ideal excipient" sentence since possible allergic reactions are not ideal. [[User:Jenkstom|Jenkstom]] ([[User talk:Jenkstom|talk]]) 15:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I have added a link to original research done for a patient in 2012. You may call or write the clinic to verify this information (I presume, I did not ask permission). I have removed the "ideal excipient" sentence since possible allergic reactions are not ideal. I DO have permission from the patient. [[User:Jenkstom|Jenkstom]] ([[User talk:Jenkstom|talk]]) 15:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


='ideal excipient' paragraph is unclear =
='ideal excipient' paragraph is unclear =

Revision as of 15:03, 23 March 2017

WikiProject iconChemistry Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

4/18/16. RandalwikiM has challenged a producer of supplements on the size and safety of the microcrystalline cellulose in their products. He is awaiting their response. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandalwikiM (talkcontribs) 04:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a link to original research done for a patient in 2012. You may call or write the clinic to verify this information (I presume, I did not ask permission). I have removed the "ideal excipient" sentence since possible allergic reactions are not ideal. I DO have permission from the patient. Jenkstom (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'ideal excipient' paragraph is unclear

It's not made clear how (or even if) the properties listed make it an 'ideal' excipient. 'ideal' also implies optimality, so it should be stated why it fulfills the requirements of an excipient.

Xbao (talk) 00:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]