Talk:N-wave: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Marginal page: Reply |
→Marginal page: Reply |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:{{reply|Ldm1954}} A brief definition with little other information is exactly what a stub is supposed to be. I generally just let them grow unless there's reason to suspect the topic is not notable or it's only here because of a commercial interest. We certainly don't require peer review before creating new articles; that's what doomed [[Nupedia]]. BTW, [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)]] is the wrong guideline for notability on this article; it only applies to people doing academic work. |
:{{reply|Ldm1954}} A brief definition with little other information is exactly what a stub is supposed to be. I generally just let them grow unless there's reason to suspect the topic is not notable or it's only here because of a commercial interest. We certainly don't require peer review before creating new articles; that's what doomed [[Nupedia]]. BTW, [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)]] is the wrong guideline for notability on this article; it only applies to people doing academic work. |
||
:That said, this topic was already covered at [[Sonic boom]], which is why I made a redirect there. {{reply|Sunlitsky}} Is this topic of interest in cases other than sonic booms? -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 03:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
:That said, this topic was already covered at [[Sonic boom]], which is why I made a redirect there. {{reply|Sunlitsky}} Is this topic of interest in cases other than sonic booms? -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 03:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
::This is why I tagged it. Currently it is just a definition that is already covered elsewhere and of course [[WP:NOTDICTIONARY]] applies. It seems that @[[User:Sunlitsky|Sunlitsky]] felt that your redirect was wrong, but... [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 03:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Feedback from New Page Review process == |
== Feedback from New Page Review process == |
||
Revision as of 03:10, 27 April 2024
Marginal page
To Sunlitsky and perhaps Beland. During WP:NPP I have checked this page. It is currently just a minor mention with very little information of general use. As such it is definitely a candidate for deletion via WP:AfD if it is not substantially improved. It probably should not have been directly created without being peer reviewed first. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Ldm1954: A brief definition with little other information is exactly what a stub is supposed to be. I generally just let them grow unless there's reason to suspect the topic is not notable or it's only here because of a commercial interest. We certainly don't require peer review before creating new articles; that's what doomed Nupedia. BTW, Wikipedia:Notability (academics) is the wrong guideline for notability on this article; it only applies to people doing academic work.
- That said, this topic was already covered at Sonic boom, which is why I made a redirect there. @Sunlitsky: Is this topic of interest in cases other than sonic booms? -- Beland (talk) 03:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is why I tagged it. Currently it is just a definition that is already covered elsewhere and of course WP:NOTDICTIONARY applies. It seems that @Sunlitsky felt that your redirect was wrong, but... Ldm1954 (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: You are tagged as creator, although I realize it got changed. I have indicated that it needs work or more.