Revision as of 06:09, 1 December 2017

The bit about the constructor's son dying of a overdose was very irrelevant, unnecessary, and removed. 70.90.174.173 (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to agree. It has nothing to do with the subject of the article. EricSerge (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship! Who's fuckin' side are you on?

==

How about mentioning that it was shown/discussed on a tv show called 'Conspiracy Theory' where they investigated it's potential connection to the Illuminati as a post-apocalyptic fortress for the elite? Is that out of bounds too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.153.242 (talk) 15:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last year Huff said that the house should be torn down because it wasn't safe enough. There's also conspiracy theories, such as that it belongs to the Illuminati and that there are secret tunnels underneath, some of which go all the way to Los Angeles. I heard about the house on YouTube, plugged the name into Google, and all sorts of insane stuff popped up. Mari Adkins 06:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:23, 22 July 2017 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,546,196 edits m Signing comment by 69.174.153.242 - "illuminati fortress investigation" Tag: Reverted ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:09, 1 December 2017 edit undo MariAdkins (talk \| contribs) 220 edits mNo edit summary Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	How about mentioning that it was shown/discussed on a tv show called 'Conspiracy Theory' where they investigated it's potential connection to the Illuminati as a post-apocalyptic fortress for the elite? Is that out of bounds too? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.174.153.242\|69.174.153.242]] ([[User talk:69.174.153.242#top\|talk]]) 15:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		How about mentioning that it was shown/discussed on a tv show called 'Conspiracy Theory' where they investigated it's potential connection to the Illuminati as a post-apocalyptic fortress for the elite? Is that out of bounds too? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.174.153.242\|69.174.153.242]] ([[User talk:69.174.153.242#top\|talk]]) 15:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			Last year Huff said that the house should be torn down because it wasn't safe enough. There's also conspiracy theories, such as that it belongs to the Illuminati and that there are secret tunnels underneath, some of which go all the way to Los Angeles. I heard about the house on YouTube, plugged the name into Google, and all sorts of insane stuff popped up. Mari Adkins 06:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)