Talk:Radiopharmacology: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: Line 6:


The article on [[astatine]] mentions the uses of this element, particularly treating cancer; why then is it not mentioned as a radiopharmaceutical?[[Special:Contributions/24.184.234.24|24.184.234.24]] ([[User talk:24.184.234.24|talk]]) 02:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)LeucineZipper
The article on [[astatine]] mentions the uses of this element, particularly treating cancer; why then is it not mentioned as a radiopharmaceutical?[[Special:Contributions/24.184.234.24|24.184.234.24]] ([[User talk:24.184.234.24|talk]]) 02:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)LeucineZipper
Is the problem its not being approved in humans currently?[[Special:Contributions/24.184.234.24|24.184.234.24]] ([[User talk:24.184.234.24|talk]]) 02:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)LeucineZipper

Revision as of 02:09, 15 June 2010

WikiProject iconMedicine B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPharmacology B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The article on astatine mentions the uses of this element, particularly treating cancer; why then is it not mentioned as a radiopharmaceutical?24.184.234.24 (talk) 02:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)LeucineZipper Is the problem its not being approved in humans currently?24.184.234.24 (talk) 02:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)LeucineZipper[reply]