Talk:Safechuck v. MJJ Productions: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Lawsuit: new section
 
Line 2: Line 2:


Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. [[User:Bhdshoes2|Bhdshoes2]] ([[User talk:Bhdshoes2|talk]]) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. [[User:Bhdshoes2|Bhdshoes2]] ([[User talk:Bhdshoes2|talk]]) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

:Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian [[user:alansohn]] as I know he is an expert on Wikipedia guidelines [[User:Bhdshoes2|Bhdshoes2]] ([[User talk:Bhdshoes2|talk]]) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:09, 9 December 2023

Lawsuit

Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian user:alansohn as I know he is an expert on Wikipedia guidelines Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]