Talk:Subpoena ad testificandum: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wp
Andy85719 (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:


:I agree. Also, very large sections of it are not directly relevant and appear to have been written for somebody's school paper. [[User:JonathanFreed|JonathanFreed]] ([[User talk:JonathanFreed|talk]]) 23:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
:I agree. Also, very large sections of it are not directly relevant and appear to have been written for somebody's school paper. [[User:JonathanFreed|JonathanFreed]] ([[User talk:JonathanFreed|talk]]) 23:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

==Article contents==

The contents of this article, especially toward the end, are highly awkward. This article is significant and requires immediate editing to reduce fluency problems and non sequitors.[[User:Andy85719|Andy85719]] ([[User talk:Andy85719|talk]]) 01:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:33, 4 July 2010

WikiProject iconLaw B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLatin B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article length

This article is way too long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.60.68.45 (talkcontribs) 10:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Also, very large sections of it are not directly relevant and appear to have been written for somebody's school paper. JonathanFreed (talk) 23:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article contents

The contents of this article, especially toward the end, are highly awkward. This article is significant and requires immediate editing to reduce fluency problems and non sequitors.Andy85719 (talk) 01:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]