Talk:The Archer (song)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Brachy0008 (talk | contribs) →Mentioned...?: Reply |
Brachy0008 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
*::I'm pretty sure that's the ref I checked; it says that Swift began the show with "The Archer" [[User:Gained|Gained]] ([[User talk:Gained|talk]]) 09:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
*::I'm pretty sure that's the ref I checked; it says that Swift began the show with "The Archer" [[User:Gained|Gained]] ([[User talk:Gained|talk]]) 09:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:::Pretty sure the FN changed to 11 [[User:Brachy0008|'''<span style="color:blue">Brachy</span><small><span style="color:black">08</span></small>''']] <sub><small>[[User talk:Brachy0008|<span style="color:green">(Talk)</span>]]</small></sub> 03:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
*:::Pretty sure the FN changed to 11 [[User:Brachy0008|'''<span style="color:blue">Brachy</span><small><span style="color:black">08</span></small>''']] <sub><small>[[User talk:Brachy0008|<span style="color:green">(Talk)</span>]]</small></sub> 03:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
<s> |
* <s>FN 17-18: Neither sources refer to The Archer as a ballad.</s> |
||
And that brings us to FN <s>20</s> 22. I will pause the source review here (for now), but please address the points. |
And that brings us to FN <s>20</s> 22. I will pause the source review here (for now), but please address the points. |
||
Update: Reviewed more sources (managed to reach FN 32)... so far so good! I would list more stuff below once I can see an issue. |
|||
===Other stuff=== |
===Other stuff=== |
Revision as of 03:39, 17 April 2024
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 12:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 13:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Gained I have placed down some points for improvement. That is all I can do for today, so be sure to keep your eyes open for more points and call-outs from ME-HEE-HEEEEEEEEEE! Brachy08 (Talk) 06:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Review, is this article ready for review? Does it say it does not want that, but you say it does... How's the intro?
Copyvios
- Violation is possible (Earwig's). However, it is mainly from quotations from the song. Copyvios are 43.2%, which is a bit concerning
Image review
- A bit concerned about the image. I would let it pass, but can you check if you can find a better image? Thanks!
Sourcing
Reliable...?
- FN 59 is unreliable.
Mentioned...?
FN 1: Does not have the quoted textslove letter to love itself
andfull spectrum of love
. Needs rephrasing.FN 3: Does not support the release of The Archer for streaming and digital download.FN 6: Does not contain the quoted texta different side
.- FN 10: Does not say that The Archer is performed, only said that Swift performed
several songs from Lover
. FN 17-18: Neither sources refer to The Archer as a ballad.
And that brings us to FN 20 22. I will pause the source review here (for now), but please address the points.
Update: Reviewed more sources (managed to reach FN 32)... so far so good! I would list more stuff below once I can see an issue.
Other stuff
- Live performances of The Archer are under background and release. Tell me why is it present right here, right now. If you want this to be a GA, I wish you would explain and address it.
- I'm not the one who did this but I assume that both "Background and release" and "Live performances" aspects of the article were very short so it was combined to make it look more complete. Gained (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
A bit of source overload. (FN 21-24)