Talk:Vakkalagadda: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:49, 6 July 2011

India: Andhra Pradesh / Geography Stub‑class

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh.
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I disgaree with most of the statements in this article. This is totally biased. Please provide the appropriate citations for the statements — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppinnam (talk • contribs) 20:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Please provide the appropriate citations or please remove those contradictory statements which cause damage to the existing political parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppinnam (talk • contribs) 01:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Under the rule of TDP 1. In 2008, Vakkalagadda got Nirmal puraskar award. http://nirmalgrampuraskar.nic.in/NGP2010Static/PDF/SummaryPRI/Total/Total_2008GP.pdf 2. All the school buildings are renovated. 3. Plantation was done to the maximum extent. If you are from vakkalagadda, You can see this on either side of roads. 4. Roads were laid for the gudems, BC colony and even in most parts of the village. 5. Park, temple, shopping complexes were built.

Before commenting, Please visit vakkalagadda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.8.220.34 (talk) 09:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide valid references

Wikipedia is all about providing valid proofs. It is not about visiting the village and seeing all those developments over there. All the references you provided are not valid enough to show whatever mentioned is correct. Please provide valid references or remove those contradictory statements.

Ppinnam (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Almost from the last 20 years, Vakkalagadda Is under TDP rule.

It took me in a surprise by your statement that, the award given in 2008 is for the activities done by CPI 15 years ago???

If you still feel that it is CPI which did all the development activities, please provide one valid reference in support of your statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.8.220.34 (talk) 06:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation need to be there for statements in Wikipedia

Development is an ongoing process. We cannot attribute success to a single group. Let's say tomorrow someone else is going to come to power and they just can't take the credit for the whole development unless it is a big revolutionary change. The result might be because of the ground work layed by the predecessors.

Since I can't provide a valid reference I am not going to give an one-sided statement in a site like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a personal blog to express one's own ideas. So, if you can't provide a valid reference , Please don't put statements like "There is no development under CPI rule". You can have a neutral statement instead.

Bottomoline: Reference needed.

Ppinnam (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 If you still feel that it is CPI which did all the development activities, please provide one valid reference in support of your statement.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.8.220.34|192.8.220.34]] ([[User talk:192.8.220.34|talk]]) 06:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Citation need to be there for statements in Wikipedia ==
+Development is an ongoing process. We cannot attribute success to a single group. Let's say tomorrow someone else is going to come to power and they just can't take the credit for the whole development unless it is a big revolutionary change. The result might be because of the ground work layed by the predecessors.
+Since I can't provide a valid reference I am not going to give an one-sided statement in a site like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a personal blog to express one's own ideas. So, if you can't provide a valid reference , Please don't put statements like "There is no development under CPI rule". You can have a neutral statement instead.
+'''Bottomoline''': Reference needed.
+[[User:Ppinnam|Ppinnam]] ([[User talk:Ppinnam|talk]]) 14:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)