Talk:Vaxxed: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:02, 31 March 2016

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Medicine Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hit Piece

The author of this page clearly is trying to discredit the movie providing very subjective opinions on the topic.

"The film was directed by discredited former physician and anti-vaccine activist". This sentence clearly proves the point that the author is biased.

The author references material that may or may not be in the film as clearly he has NOT seen it yet as its unreleased. Conzar (talk) 08:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The film discredits itself perfectly adequately without any assistance. Guy (Help!) 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guy, have you seen this movie. Can you please substantiate your claims?Conzar (talk) 10:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about the movie. At this point, posting information and rebuttals about the contents of the movie are simply unsubstantiated since no one here has actually viewed the movie. Its my opinion that several editors are trying to frame this movie in a negative light and are having the audacity of accusing me of abusing the system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conzar (talk • contribs) 10:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also note, user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG has reverted my changes and guess what, his user has been deleted. Sock puppet account most likely. Conzar (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CNN

Another source: [1]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Language

Language=English

Really? From what I've seen of it, doublespeak comes closer... Guy (Help!) 17:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 The article is about the movie.  At this point, posting information and rebuttals about the contents of the movie are simply unsubstantiated since no one here has actually viewed the movie.  Its my opinion that several editors are trying to frame this movie in a negative light and are having the audacity of accusing me of abusing the system.  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Conzar|Conzar]] ([[User talk:Conzar|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Conzar|contribs]]) 10:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Also note, user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG has reverted my changes and guess what, his user has been deleted.  Sock puppet account most likely.
+[[User:Conzar|Conzar]] ([[User talk:Conzar|talk]]) 11:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 == CNN ==