This article sucks worse than a two-dollar whore and is desparately in need of attention. Please see its talk page for more information.
This user page survived a bad faith nomination for deletion! This is proof that sometimes common sense can overrule bad-intentioned users who would have Wikipedia censored to accomidate their own beliefs.
This article is a current shitty article candidate. A shitty article should exemplify Wikipedia's most outrageous, atrocious, and downright shittiest work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.
It is believed that this user may be editing Wikipedia under the influence of drugs.
A userbox, {{User pedophile}}, was created by Paroxysm that said "This user is a pedophile." It was first used by Joeyramoney. The template was deleted and Joeyramoney was blocked even though he has been known to put false and humorous userboxes on his userpage. The fact that most people (including myself) do not find a joke about "a user being a pedophile" funny in the least, however, does not mean that an admin, a user, or anyone else has the right to say what is and is not funny. There is no established consensus on Wikipedia about what the community will or will not tolerate in terms of humor.
About a week after the original userbox was deleted, SPUI created a parody template, {{User paedo}} in protest of this whole situation that read "OMG!!! This user has been attracted to underage females while not underage himself! This user should be banned." Admins proceeded to blank and protect his userpage and revert and protect his talk page. Eventually the whole case went to ArbCom and SPUI, an editor with tens of thousands of productive, good faith edits was banned for ten days for "fueling the fire".
As I have known SPUI personally for many years, I, out of support for him, proceeded to put SPUI's parody pedo box on my userpage 64 times. It was removed and I was threatened with a one-week block by Sam Korn for what he perceived as trolling and my "fanning the flames".
This whole situation borders on a ridiculous moral panic and is unacceptible in my eyes because, as offensive as a userbox stating attraction to underage females may be, I find the way that SPUI was treated by ArbCom to be equally as offensive.
Wikipedia administrator Doc Glasgow is a vandal. Then this nut job had the balls to block SPUI when he reverted the vandalism.
The seven words you can't say on radio and television boys and girls: Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits. Why the hell are people afraid of these words? Are these words somehow magical and saying them or hearing them will send you to Hell?
Jimbo Wales needs to get his act together and realize that bidding "good riddance" to editors with tens of thousands of productive edits will eventually lead to no editors being here to write his encyclopedia for him.
WARNING/GUARANTEE: This album contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor supress. In some socially retarded areas, religious fanatics and ultra-conservative political organizations violate your First Amendment Rights by attempting to censor rock & roll albums. We feel that this is un-Constitutional and un-American. As an alternative to these government-supported programs (designed to keep you docile and ignorant), Barking Pumpkin is pleased to provide stimulating digital audio entertainment for those of you who have outgrown the ordinary. The language and concepts contained herein are GUARANTEED NOT TO CAUSE ETERNAL TORMENT IN THE PLACE WHERE THE GUY WITH THE HORNS AND THE POINTED STICK CONDUCTS HIS BUSINESS. This guarantee is as real as the threats of the video fundamentalists who use attacks on rock music in their attempt to transform America into a nation of check-mailing nincompoops (in the name of Jesus Christ). If there is a hell, its fires wait for them, not us.
_closeup.jpg){kind=link}