User:Aschin1/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Controversy == |
== Controversy == |
||
Sarah Baartman has been the subject of much research, even after her death. [[Anne Fausto-Sterling]] argues that the mere study of Sarah Baartman as someone outside of the norm is in fact a form of objectification. Why do we even ask the question regarding the size of Baartman's genitalia?<ref>{{cite book|last=Fausto-Sterling|first=Anne|title=The Gender and Science Reader|year=2001|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-21358-5|pages=343-366|author=Anne Fausto-Sterling|authorlink=Gender, Race, and Nation: The Comparative Anatomy of "Hottentot" Women in Europe, 1815-1817|editor=Muriel Lederman}}</ref> |
Sarah Baartman has been the subject of much research, even after her death. <ref>[[Anne Fausto-Sterling]] argues that the mere study of Sarah Baartman as someone outside of the norm is in fact a form of objectification. Why do we even ask the question regarding the size of Baartman's genitalia?<ref>{{cite book|last=Fausto-Sterling|first=Anne|title=The Gender and Science Reader|year=2001|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-21358-5|pages=343-366|author=Anne Fausto-Sterling|authorlink=Gender, Race, and Nation: The Comparative Anatomy of "Hottentot" Women in Europe, 1815-1817|editor=Muriel Lederman}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 18:31, 6 November 2012
Enforcement
United States
The government provided many incentives for black women at the poverty line to utilize Norplant. In many cases, Norplant was a requirement by many employers before they would hire potential employees.
Controversy
Sarah Baartman has been the subject of much research, even after her death. Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).