User:Noloop: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Noloop (talk | contribs)
Noloop (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float:{{{float|left}}}; border:{{{border-width|1}}}px solid {{{border-color|{{{1|#000}}}}}}; margin:1px;">
<div style="float:{{{float|center}}}; border:{{{border-width|1}}}px solid {{{border-color|{{{1|#000}}}}}}; margin:1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: ;"
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: ;"
| style="width:45px; height:45px; background:{{{logo-background|{{{1|#000}}}}}}; text-align:center; font-size:{{{logo-size|{{{5|12}}}}}}pt; color:{{{logo-color|#fff}}};" | '''{{{logo|{{{3|END}}}}}}'''
| style="width:45px; height:45px; background:{{{logo-background|{{{1|#000}}}}}}; text-align:center; font-size:{{{logo-size|{{{5|12}}}}}}pt; color:{{{logo-color|#fff}}};" | '''{{{logo|{{{3|END}}}}}}'''
Line 8: Line 8:




==My contributions==
I've contributed a lot of content to [[Women's rights in Saudi Arabia]] and [[Bitch]]. Not coincidentally, both articles were abandoned and I was able to work alone.


Socrates (or one of those guys) defined wisdom as knowing what you don't know. Knowledge is a process of building up, and also tearing down. To that end, I've attempted to contribute to a number of articles on the [[Historicity of Jesus]] (see also [[Christ myth theory]], [[Historical Jesus]], and [[Jesus]]). There is a facaded of certainty in these articles, defended by Christian editors who care more about their religion than truth (not exactly the first time). I've attempted some needed tearing down on these articles. Wikipedia is very bad at providing Socratic knowledge--awareness of what is not known. Its policies privilege the construction of knowledge by building up rather than tearing down, even when what is built up is distorted, sloppily researched, and culturally biased. [[User:Noloop|Noloop]] ([[User talk:Noloop|talk]]) 21:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
==temp storage==
/*** BEGIN WIKIBREAK ENFORCER ***/
addOnloadHook(function() {
/*** Start editing here ***/
// When you want to end your break?
// no leading zeroes. (example: 7 - correct, 07 - incorrect)
var date = { year: 2010, month: 12, day: 6};
var time = { hours: 20, minutes: 22, seconds: 0 };
/*** Stop editing here ***/
var currentDate = new Date();
var enforcedBreakEnd = new Date(
date.year,date.month-1,date.day,time.hours,time.minutes,time.seconds);
if (currentDate <= enforcedBreakEnd) {
alert("Enforced wikibreak until "+enforcedBreakEnd.toLocaleString()
+ "\n(now is "+currentDate.toLocaleString()+")\n\nBye!");
location = "http://"+location.host+"/w/index.php?title="
+ "Special:Userlogout&returnto=Main_Page";
}
});
/*** END WIKIBREAK ENFORCER ***/

===experiments===
{| style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#bbffbb; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
| style="text-align: left;" |And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their khimar over their bosoms and not display their beauty
|-
| style="text-align: right;" |{{cite quran|24|31|style=nosup}}
|}

Revision as of 21:37, 11 August 2010

END This user has no more userboxes.


My contributions

I've contributed a lot of content to Women's rights in Saudi Arabia and Bitch. Not coincidentally, both articles were abandoned and I was able to work alone.

Socrates (or one of those guys) defined wisdom as knowing what you don't know. Knowledge is a process of building up, and also tearing down. To that end, I've attempted to contribute to a number of articles on the Historicity of Jesus (see also Christ myth theory, Historical Jesus, and Jesus). There is a facaded of certainty in these articles, defended by Christian editors who care more about their religion than truth (not exactly the first time). I've attempted some needed tearing down on these articles. Wikipedia is very bad at providing Socratic knowledge--awareness of what is not known. Its policies privilege the construction of knowledge by building up rather than tearing down, even when what is built up is distorted, sloppily researched, and culturally biased. Noloop (talk) 21:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)