User talk:AlbinoFerret

This my Talk Page. Leave a message and I will get back to you. If I left a message on your talk page , please respond to me there as I will be looking there for the response. AlbinoFerret 13:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You reverted 5 edits here, [1] and made a 6th revert here [2] Mystery Wolff (talk) 14:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

This is a crazy warning, and I suggest you read what constitutes reverts and how they are counted. WP:3RR AlbinoFerret 14:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

The case at present is appropriate to Notice, as it stands. I chose to take the first prescribed step to generate the warning as you see above. PLEASE READ IT.

Specifically: "Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly."

• Your response seems to be indicative that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly, evidenced by the dismissing of the standardized warning as "crazy" and pointing the circumvention aspects of 3RR on technical aspects.

I will give you the link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring#Handling_of_edit-warring_behaviors to assist your understanding.

Please refrain from edit warring. Thank you. Mystery Wolff (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

I seriously suggest you drop this very bad attempt to twist the rules. The revert was 1 in 24 hours, if you continue you will find yourself on a noticeboard. AlbinoFerret 12:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

AlbinoFerret, the warning here to you is well placed, and its by the instructions. You have again instigated a Revert to proper edits here [3] I am again requesting that you stop edit warring with improvement to articles. In the case I just pointed to, the information you put back in, is not within the Cite. I am going to replace my edit. If you want to take it to TALK do so, but do not simply remove my edits without any explanations to the specifics. Claiming MEDRS is not a catch-all. You have now reverted SEVEN (7) of my edits in the space of just days. Please stop this, and the threats also. Thank you. Mystery Wolff (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)