User talk:BirdZilla: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BirdZilla (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:


: You have no clear consensus and pretending otherwise isn't fooling anyone. I expect you'll run to arbitration, but I hope that'll note your attempts at effectively owning the article. [[User:BirdZilla|BirdZilla]] ([[User talk:BirdZilla#top|talk]]) 23:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
: You have no clear consensus and pretending otherwise isn't fooling anyone. I expect you'll run to arbitration, but I hope that'll note your attempts at effectively owning the article. [[User:BirdZilla|BirdZilla]] ([[User talk:BirdZilla#top|talk]]) 23:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

== Arbitration enforcement ==
:There is a discussion regarding your conduct at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#BirdZilla]]. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 00:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:05, 11 March 2021

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 17:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Ben Garrison

Your edit-warring against talk-page consensus is prohibited by policy. Should you revert again, I will file an Arbitration Enforcement request that you be permanently topic-banned from Ben Garrison, broadly construed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have no clear consensus and pretending otherwise isn't fooling anyone. I expect you'll run to arbitration, but I hope that'll note your attempts at effectively owning the article. BirdZilla (talk) 23:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

There is a discussion regarding your conduct at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#BirdZilla. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]