User talk:DARKXRAV3N

We've been through this[edit]

Hi there again! We've been through this, several times. 1) You can't just make shit up even if they are plausible calculations. You have to show your sources, with references to other sites where they have done the math, or have actual measured numbers. 2) You can't run discussions in the comment fields of edits, use the Talk page. That's what they are for. 3) Please change your ways. Wikipedia is a place with thousands of editors, with set rules that everyone must follow. Including you. If you do, your life and everyone else's will be better. -- Henriok (talk) 08:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So 4 + 4 is 9 got it, and you cussed I should report you 😏 DARKXRAV3N (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources get it wrong at times you have to understand that, many articles make grammatical and numerical calculational mistakes, if you’re going to get a source make sure they know what they’re talking about and know how to do calculations right, don’t just add wrong sources for the hell of it, you got a brain, I assume you know basic math skills: use it and leave me the hell alone, when you get RIGHT sources that know basic math let me knowDARKXRAV3N (talk) 02:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are on the wrong website for this sort of reasoning. Use sources or your account will be blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 02:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please read WP:V. Any time you add or change content on Wikipedia, you need to add a reliable source.
Please read WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. I wasn't doing any math, and neither should you. I undid your edit simply because of point number 1 above - I saw you add new content without a source.
Please read WP:NPA. No name calling.

I recommend learning and changing quickly, or you're going to find your account blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 01:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nintendo Switch, you may be blocked from editing. Oh, and don't call people names in edit summaries Drmies (talk) 02:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop abusing your power by certain editors going to other admins just to back up their wrongdoings, I’m trying to correct his calculation errors and erroneous sources, I could do that too put wrong info and not fix it and go to an admin to back me up even though I’m wrong is that how it is now? It’s not my problem that editor you’re backing up doesn’t get right sources or knows basic math skills I’m warning you if you continue to back up his errors then I can take it up with another admin as well :) have a good day, fyi. I’m trying to do right by putting correct and accurate info as much as possible do the right thing and stop backing up editors who put the wrong info or I’ll go to another admin and file a complaint against you and him , like I said have a hood day DARKXRAV3N (talk) 03:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not trying to do the right thing: you're just fighting with other editors. You could have made your case on the talk page. Also, that "stop abusing your powers" rant is painfully poorly written (especially punctuation--how can we trust math from someone who can't punctuate properly?), and it indicates that you're just picking fights. Your current block is temporary. When it expires, please do better. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Nintendo Switch did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 22:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Make this edit again, continuing the edit warring you were blocked for in January, and your next block will be indefinite. You are misusing sources, adding unclear and poorly formatted information, and you are edit warring. If you are having trouble getting the information across, try the talk page and experienced editors will help sort it out. -- ferret (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsed. NOTHERE/CIR. Sergecross73 msg me 17:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 14:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]