User talk:Freestylefrappe: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Moe Epsilon (talk | contribs) SWD316 |
Flcelloguy (talk | contribs) Kumanovo protection |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Personal== |
==Personal== |
||
I was just wondering, did I say something to make you mad or something I did that made you mad? I was wondering if you had something personal against me? [[User:SWD316|SWD316]] 02:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
I was just wondering, did I say something to make you mad or something I did that made you mad? I was wondering if you had something personal against me? [[User:SWD316|SWD316]] 02:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
==[[Kumanovo]] protection== |
|||
:(cross-posting to [[Talk:Kumanovo]) Freestylefrappe, you should '''never''' unprotect a page in which you are involved in a content dispute and then proceed to edit the page. Even if you thought the protection was unnecessary, you still shouldn't unprotect - ask the protecting admin (me, in this case) or another admin to unprotect. You unprotected this page with the edit summary "Not needed" after I had protected it and then edited the page several times. Your above post (on the article's talk page) also indicates that you thought protection was not necessary, yet you have not answered to my response yet. Even if the unprotect and then editing is justified, an involved editor should never do this because it creates the perception of misusing your administrative tools. In the future, please '''do not''' unprotect and then edit an article in which you are involved. Thank you. [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 17:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:43, 19 December 2005
- DO NOT THANK ME for an RFA I voted on
- DO NOT ENGAGE IN THE FOLLOWING...
- cruel and unusual punishment
- involvement in private conversations - dont jump in if you aren't involved in the article or topic in question, start a new section
- personal attacks towards any user
Personal
I was just wondering, did I say something to make you mad or something I did that made you mad? I was wondering if you had something personal against me? SWD316 02:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Kumanovo protection
- (cross-posting to [[Talk:Kumanovo]) Freestylefrappe, you should never unprotect a page in which you are involved in a content dispute and then proceed to edit the page. Even if you thought the protection was unnecessary, you still shouldn't unprotect - ask the protecting admin (me, in this case) or another admin to unprotect. You unprotected this page with the edit summary "Not needed" after I had protected it and then edited the page several times. Your above post (on the article's talk page) also indicates that you thought protection was not necessary, yet you have not answered to my response yet. Even if the unprotect and then editing is justified, an involved editor should never do this because it creates the perception of misusing your administrative tools. In the future, please do not unprotect and then edit an article in which you are involved. Thank you. Flcelloguy (A note?) 17:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)