User talk:Lecen: Difference between revisions
Cambalachero (talk | contribs) →Arbitration enforcement: new section |
→Arbitration enforcement block: sig, subst |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
There is a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Lecen]] [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 16:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC) |
There is a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Lecen]] [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 16:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Arbitration enforcement block == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, and for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WP:AE&oldid=583818464#Lecen violating your interaction ban], [[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]]you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for '''one month'''. You are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]] once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 19:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Reversal of enforcement actions|procedure prohibiting administrators]] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> |
|||
Revision as of 19:20, 29 November 2013
 Archives (Index) |
MarshalN20 clarification request
Courtesy note: Please see the arbitrators' comment section, where I have asked why you have violated your interaction ban. You are not permitted to comment on Marshal except in amendment/clarification requests relating to the interaction ban between you. AGK [•] 00:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement
There is a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Lecen Cambalachero (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement block
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.