User talk:Ligulem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
notification of speedy deletion nomination of Template:GFDL-no-disclaimers/doc
BJBot (talk | contribs)
BJBot, Adam Powell has been proposed for deletion
Line 14: Line 14:


Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 21:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 21:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
==AfD nomination of Adam Powell==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated [[Adam Powell]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Adam Powell | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Powell]] | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Powell]] }} and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 15:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:03, 9 March 2008


Archive Index | Archive

Please note that I'm currently rather inactive on this wiki. Thanks. --Ligulem 07:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Templates using ParserFunctions, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Templates using ParserFunctions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Templates using ParserFunctions during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Jonathan Kovaciny (talk|contribs) 20:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with deleting this. --Ligulem 07:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:GFDL-no-disclaimers/doc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Adam Powell

An editor has nominated Adam Powell, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Powell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]